2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are concerns regarding implant subsidence, compromised rotational stability, and intraoperative fracture in osteoporotic bone. Reports of cementless RTSAs have demonstrated good results and reliable fixation in the setting of fractures 60,61 . However, in a series of 30 patients who underwent cementless RTSA in the setting of comminuted PHFs, there was 1 complication involving an intraoperative humeral fracture while preparing the humerus 61 .…”
Section: Complications Of Rtsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are concerns regarding implant subsidence, compromised rotational stability, and intraoperative fracture in osteoporotic bone. Reports of cementless RTSAs have demonstrated good results and reliable fixation in the setting of fractures 60,61 . However, in a series of 30 patients who underwent cementless RTSA in the setting of comminuted PHFs, there was 1 complication involving an intraoperative humeral fracture while preparing the humerus 61 .…”
Section: Complications Of Rtsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, uncemented stems carry a theoretical risk of early subsidence or loosening due to lack of rotational stability if the press fit stability is lost in the early postoperative period. The role of uncemented, press fit stem in RTSA for PHFs has been reported in several studies but only a few of them directly compare uncemented to cemented humeral stems [ 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ]. Lopiz et al [ 61 ] retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with primary RTSA for PHF, which included 45 cemented and 23 press fit humeral stems.…”
Section: Special Considerations For Rtsa For Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These innovations are intended to allow osteointegration between implant and tuberosities [31]. Depending on the bone quality and implant design, fracture stems can either be implanted in a traditional cemented technique or cementless with a press-fit technique [63]. In a recent meta-analysis looking at outcomes of fracture stems versus non-fracture stems in proximal humerus fractures, fracture stems were shown to result in significantly improved functional scores, external rotation and forward flexion as well as tuberosity healing [64].…”
Section: Implant Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%