Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Early Loaded Maxillary Anterior Implants: Three-Year Follow-up

Kahramanoğlu, Erkut; Aslan, Yılmaz Umut; Özkan, Yaşar; Özkan, Yasemin

doi:10.11607/prd.3936

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Our study has shown no statistically significant differences among soft tissue parameters (MBI, MPI and PPD) between the observed groups of crowns, which is in correlation with previous three-year follow-up study for the anterior implant screw-retained IPS e.max crowns, where similar results were demonstrated [23]. In the mentioned study, the mean values of MPI and MBI at baseline, after six months, one year and three years showed no statistically significant differences [23]. In addition, another study which compared clinical performances of screw-retained, monolithic, zirconia, and cemented porcelain-fused-to-metal implant crowns, showed no statistically significant difference between the study and the control groups in terms of the soft tissue parameters such as bleeding on probing and plaque index at the third, sixth, nineth, and 12 th month after prosthetic loading [24].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Nevertheless, in our research, statistically significant difference was registered in terms of mean values of MPI between baseline and after 6 months in the study group of crowns. Also, statistically significant intragroup differences were noticed in terms of PPD during the time, both in the study and control group of crowns, which is in correlation with the results of previous studies [23,24,25].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…In the mentioned study, the mean values of MPI and MBI at baseline, after six months, one year and three years showed no statistically significant differences [23]. In addition, another study which compared clinical performances of screw-retained, monolithic, zirconia, and cemented porcelain-fused-to-metal implant crowns, showed no statistically significant difference between the study and the control groups in terms of the soft tissue parameters such as bleeding on probing and plaque index at the third, sixth, nineth, and 12 th month after prosthetic loading [24].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 60%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Lithium disilicate and PEEK implant-retained single crowns - a randomized, prospective clinical study

Joksimovic

Šćepanović

Staletovic³

et al. 2022

Srp Arh Celok Lek

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction/Objective. Comparing two materials under the same conditions is the best way to define differences between them. PEEK is a polymer that has many possible uses in dentistry as already well-known lithium disilicate ceramics. The aim of this study was to compare peri-implant soft tissue healing and evaluate patient satisfaction with esthetics in different observation periods, as well as the success and survival rate of both types of crowns. Methods. The study was conducted as a clinical, prospective, randomized split-mouth study on 17 patients with bilaterally missing upper teeth of the same type, replaced with dental implants. Study outcomes have been analyzed with subjective (VAS scale) and objective parameters (MBI, MPI and PPD) baseline, six and twelve months after fixing crowns onto the implants. Results. Comparison of the results between PEEK and lithium disilicate crowns showed no statistical differences in terms of MPI, MBI and PPD in the observed periods. Analyzing MPI during observation periods in the PEEK group of crowns, statistical significance was registered between baseline values and after 6 months. Also, statistical significance was noticed in terms of PPD during the observation time both in the study and control group of crowns. Results for VAS for the esthetics showed no statistically significant difference between the groups, while VAS for restoration satisfaction showed a statistically significant difference. Conclusion. This study showed that scores of the applied subjective and objective parameters can be a reliable tool to rate the clinical outcome of implant-retained single crowns over time.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 60%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Lithium disilicate and PEEK implant-retained single crowns - a randomized, prospective clinical study

Joksimovic

Šćepanović

Staletovic³

et al. 2022

Srp Arh Celok Lek

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several treatment modalities may be considered for the replacement of a missing anterior tooth, including implant-supported prostheses (ISPs), conventional fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), and resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs), through which esthetic and functional restoration is possible. The use of ISPs is a valid and widely accepted treatment modality [1,2]. However, placing an implant is not possible in edentulous areas with large deficiencies in hard or soft tissues.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of firing procedures and layering thickness of porcelain on internal adaptation of zirconia cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study evaluated the influence of firing procedures and layering thickness of porcelain on internal adaptation of maxillary anterior cantilever zirconia resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs). Methods: The maxillary right central incisor on a model was prepared for a single-retainer zirconia RBFDP. A total of 36 frameworks of cantilever zirconia RBFDPs were classified into three groups (CB0.5, CB1.0, and CB2.0 groups) based on the thickness of the cut-back on the facial surface (0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, and 2.0 mm, respectively). Feldspathic porcelain was layered onto the facial surface of the zirconia RBFDP frameworks. Internal space widths between the abutment tooth and the framework were measured before and after porcelain firing by a replica technique. The internal space values before and after porcelain firings were compared using the paired t-test within the same group (α = 0.05). Differences in internal space values (distortion) between before and after porcelain firing were compared using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparison tests. Results: For all framework designs, internal space values after porcelain firing were significantly higher than those before firing. Among all groups, the CB0.5 group showed the lowest internal distortion values for the whole measured area. The CB2.0 group showed higher distortion values than the CB1.0 group. Conclusions: Porcelain firing procedures negatively impacted the internal space in cantilever zirconia RBFDPs. In addition, the increased volume of layering porcelain had a negative effect on the internal distortion of maxillary anterior cantilever zirconia RBFDPs.

show abstract

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Early Loaded Maxillary Anterior Implants: Three-Year Follow-up

Cited by 2 publications

References 4 publications

Lithium disilicate and PEEK implant-retained single crowns - a randomized, prospective clinical study

Lithium disilicate and PEEK implant-retained single crowns - a randomized, prospective clinical study

Effect of firing procedures and layering thickness of porcelain on internal adaptation of zirconia cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About