2018
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000005329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and pathogenic significance of IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies against the NMDA receptor

Abstract: IgG NMDAR antibodies are highly specific for anti-NMDAR encephalitis and cause a decrease of the levels of NMDAR. In contrast, IgA or IgM antibodies occur infrequently and nonspecifically in other diseases and do not alter the receptor levels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
114
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
114
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…NMDAR1-abs serum prevalence has been observed in about ~10% of the healthy population, and in those with various diseases, including stroke. (9,10,20) Similar to our study results, mainly IgM and IgA antibodies were observed. (10) The swift blood sampling in our study and the similar proportion of seropositive patients in healthy individuals suggests that antibodies were preexistent before the stroke and thus not a consequence of the acute event.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…NMDAR1-abs serum prevalence has been observed in about ~10% of the healthy population, and in those with various diseases, including stroke. (9,10,20) Similar to our study results, mainly IgM and IgA antibodies were observed. (10) The swift blood sampling in our study and the similar proportion of seropositive patients in healthy individuals suggests that antibodies were preexistent before the stroke and thus not a consequence of the acute event.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These antibodies were also found in a small proportion of healthy controls (0.4–6.3%) in all but one of the studies that included a control group [10-12], further complicating interpretation of the results. Additionally, one study that screened for IgA and IgM antibodies was negative [27]. Finally, a few other studies that either screened for antibodies against the NR1a/NR2b receptor subunit [10, 31], NR2a/NR2b subunit [32], or non-specifically for both NR1 and NR2 subunits [33-36], have found seropositivity in a small percentage of patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This arguable exception notwithstanding, overall none of these methodological issues appear to independently explain the inconsistent findings. With this in mind, perhaps one of the biggest issues relates to the subjective nature of the interpretation of antibody testing [27], rather than to the particular antibody detection method used. It has been suggested that relying on any single method of detecting antibodies in serum may increase the risk of false-positive and false-negative results [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations