2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.12.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and Morphological Outcomes in Endovascular Aortic Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Using GORE C3 EXCLUDER: Comparison between Patients Treated within and Outside Instructions for Use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Group 2 also showed more in-hospital days and more perioperative complications (p = 0.01 and 0.041, respectively), although the complications were all access-related rather than proximal-neck-related. The influence of the adherence to the IFU on sac shrinkage has been investigated for the Endurant stent graft as well as other commercially available endografts, and as in our experience, no statistically significant difference has been reported on sac shrinkage or expansion rates [10,11]. Interestingly, although the small number of aorticrelated deaths makes it difficult to obtain a statistically significative difference, it appears that aneurysm-related mortality is not affected by the adherence to the IFU; it is worth considering, however, that the aneurysm-related mortality rate and the 30-days mortality rate of Group 2 is more than double that of Group 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Group 2 also showed more in-hospital days and more perioperative complications (p = 0.01 and 0.041, respectively), although the complications were all access-related rather than proximal-neck-related. The influence of the adherence to the IFU on sac shrinkage has been investigated for the Endurant stent graft as well as other commercially available endografts, and as in our experience, no statistically significant difference has been reported on sac shrinkage or expansion rates [10,11]. Interestingly, although the small number of aorticrelated deaths makes it difficult to obtain a statistically significative difference, it appears that aneurysm-related mortality is not affected by the adherence to the IFU; it is worth considering, however, that the aneurysm-related mortality rate and the 30-days mortality rate of Group 2 is more than double that of Group 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…As previously stated, all procedures were carried out under general or regional anesthesia by or under the supervision of certified cardiovascular surgeons (TN, MK, et al) in an operating room with a portable imaging system. 17,18) Technical success was defined as a satisfactory stent graft insertion that included successful passage of the delivery system, correct deployment of the stent graft, complete withdrawal of the delivery system, freedom from open conversion, and absence of type I or III endoleak.…”
Section: Surgical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were monitored according to the institutional policy, as reported previously. 17,18) Patients were observed through the database until death or the end of the followup period in November 2021, whichever happened first. Postoperative results included any causes of death.…”
Section: Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over recent years, endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) has progressively expanded to more complex anatomies, often requiring implantation outside IFU (oIFU). 1 Whilst some researchers have reported no major differences between treatment oIFU and inside the IFU (iIFU) with respect to patient outcome, 2,3 others have described higher rates of type I endoleaks, representing treatment failure. 46 Furthermore, increased rates of reintervention (RI) have been described in oIFU–EVAR 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%