1997
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.154.12.1726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and Methodological Factors Related to Reliability of the Best-Estimate Diagnostic Procedure

Abstract: These results suggest that it is possible to identify cases that are more likely to lead to diagnostic disagreements in family and epidemiological studies and that blind diagnoses may help to prevent false positive diagnoses, which may be particularly detrimental to genetic linkage analyses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(37 reference statements)
2
78
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We indeed reported data showing that, in case of disagreements between diagnosticians, unblind bestestimate diagnoses tended to be in continuity with the most predominant diagnosis of the pedigree more frequently than blind diagnoses. 26,31 However, other studies using similar methods did not find high rates of mixed pedigrees. One cannot eliminate the possibility that the observation of such mixed pedigrees be a particularity of the Eastern Quebec population.…”
Section: Sample and Ascertainmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We indeed reported data showing that, in case of disagreements between diagnosticians, unblind bestestimate diagnoses tended to be in continuity with the most predominant diagnosis of the pedigree more frequently than blind diagnoses. 26,31 However, other studies using similar methods did not find high rates of mixed pedigrees. One cannot eliminate the possibility that the observation of such mixed pedigrees be a particularity of the Eastern Quebec population.…”
Section: Sample and Ascertainmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The ascertainment, diagnostic methods and reliability have been described in detail in previous reports. 15,26,31,36 Briefly, information from an interview with the subjects (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R), from relatives and from the lifetime medical records, was gathered. Based on this information, a consensus best-estimate DSM-III-R diagnosis (BED) was derived by a panel of four research psychiatrists who were blind to diagnoses in relatives.…”
Section: Sample and Ascertainmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17,18 Briefly, information from an interview with the subjects (using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R), from relatives and medical records, was gathered. Based on this information, a first best-estimate DSM-III-R diagnosis (BED) was derived by the field team, unblind to diagnoses in relatives.…”
Section: Diagnostic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ces derniers ont compris qu'un niveau majeur de complexité pour la SZ et la BP réside dans l'incertitude de la définition du phénotype tel qu'utilisé dans les études de liaison et les études d'association précédentes. Un pré-requis crucial, cependant, est que la méthodologie strictement à l'insu [10,11] soit maintenue tant par les cliniciens qui échantillonnent les généalogies et le phé-notype diagnostique que par les laboratoires qui produisent les génotypes. Ce ne fut pas toujours le cas dans les études pionnières.…”
Section: éCueils Méthodologiques à éViter Dans La Nouvelle Générationunclassified