2017
DOI: 10.4103/ijmm.ijmm_15_423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and Laboratory Profile of Dengue Viral Infections in and around Mangalore, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be because increased awareness among our treating physicians and general public about the disease which gives rise to increased test requests. 2,6 A male preponderance of (67%) with the gender ratio being 2:1 was noted which was similar to a study done by T Damodar et al 2,19 When it comes to age distribution, most of them infected belonged to the age between 11 and 50. Other studies also mention that adults were more affected than children and elderly population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This may be because increased awareness among our treating physicians and general public about the disease which gives rise to increased test requests. 2,6 A male preponderance of (67%) with the gender ratio being 2:1 was noted which was similar to a study done by T Damodar et al 2,19 When it comes to age distribution, most of them infected belonged to the age between 11 and 50. Other studies also mention that adults were more affected than children and elderly population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A highly significant association between positive NS1 antigen and presentation of fever with less than 5 days duration is seen in the present study as depicted in Table 6 which is comparable to results of the study from Mangalore. 2 The present study had thrombocytopenia in 16% of cases when compared to the studies done by T Damodar et al and Ritu Karoli et al they claimed to have 72% and 89% respectively. 2,13 This study had few cases of leucopenia (28.6%) when compared to 86% of the same in a study by Ritu Karoli et al This difference might be because the present study had very less numbers of secondary cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
See 3 more Smart Citations