2003
DOI: 10.1136/vr.152.16.489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and laboratory investigations of five outbreaks of foot‐and‐mouth disease during the 2001 epidemic in the United Kingdom

Abstract: Clinical and laboratory investigations of five outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) were made during the early stages of the 2001 epidemic in the UK. The first outbreak, confirmed on February 20, was at an abattoir in Essex which specialised in the processing of culled sows and boars. On February 23, the disease was confirmed at a pig farm in Northumberland which held cull sows and boars fed on waste food; the findings indicated that it was the first of the five premises to be infected. The disease had pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Infection is believed to have occurred between 25 January and 14 February, dependent on whether sheep or cattle were actually the first infected animals. According to Alexandersen et al (2002bAlexandersen et al ( , 2003 the first clinical disease could have been on 10 February if the lameness in sheep observed then was indeed FMD, however, they consider it more likely that lameness in sheep on 20 February was FMD and on 10 February not, although this is speculative. Clinical disease in cattle was dated back to 16 February based on the lesions, so the timing for "first disease observed" depends on whether it was in sheep on 10th otherwise it was first in cattle on 16 February, which the FMD experts from IAH consider is most likely.…”
Section: Epidemiological Datamentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Infection is believed to have occurred between 25 January and 14 February, dependent on whether sheep or cattle were actually the first infected animals. According to Alexandersen et al (2002bAlexandersen et al ( , 2003 the first clinical disease could have been on 10 February if the lameness in sheep observed then was indeed FMD, however, they consider it more likely that lameness in sheep on 20 February was FMD and on 10 February not, although this is speculative. Clinical disease in cattle was dated back to 16 February based on the lesions, so the timing for "first disease observed" depends on whether it was in sheep on 10th otherwise it was first in cattle on 16 February, which the FMD experts from IAH consider is most likely.…”
Section: Epidemiological Datamentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Detailed descriptions of five early outbreaks during the epidemic, including Burnside Farm and Prestwick Hall Farm, have been recorded by Alexandersen et al (2002bAlexandersen et al ( , 2003. Based on estimates of the age of FMD lesions observed in the pigs, Alexandersen et al (2002bAlexandersen et al ( , 2003 considered that significant amounts of airborne virus may have been released from Burnside Farm in the period from 3 to 24 February.…”
Section: Epidemiological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there is limited evidence for wind-borne spread during the UK epidemic in 2001 (Alexandersen et al 2003a;Mikkelsen et al 2003), and thus, for the purposes of this review, such models will be ignored.…”
Section: Models Used In 2001mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although mortality rates are generally low, morbidity is high and in the event that an FMD outbreak occurs, it results in severe economic losses to the livestock industry, especially in FMD-free regions of the world [1][2][3]. The disease is widely distributed in the developing world, in particular Africa, Asia and South America [2,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%