Clinical and histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials

Dimensional changes of the post extraction alveolar ridge, preserved with Leukocyte- and Platelet Rich Fibrin: A clinical pilot study

“…In a recent systematic review [5], xenografts were found to perform the best, followed by allografts and alloplastic materials when compared to natural healing. The amount of remaining graft material at the time of observation was higher for allografts, followed by xenografts, and alloplastic materials.…”

Absorbable collagen sponges loaded with recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 9 induces greater osteoblast differentiation when compared to bone morphogenetic protein 2

“…The use of ACS shaped in cylindrical format has been utilized in modern dentistry to facilitate wound healing in extraction sockets. Although numerous scientific reports have now documented the effects of tooth loss on dimensional changes of alveolar bone (Araújo & Lindhe, 2005; Chappuis et al, 2013; De Risi et al, 2015; Jambhekar et al, 2015; Moraschini & Barboza, 2016; Morjaria et al, 2014; Spagnoli & Choi, 2013; Tan et al, 2012), there remains a lack of options to predictably regenerate lost bone following tooth loss. For these reasons, a variety of treatment options and various biomaterials have been investigated to minimize bone loss following tooth extraction (Bayat et al, 2015; Brkovic et al, 2008; Brkovic et al, 2012; Coomes et al, 2014; Fiorellini et al, 2005; Mardas et al, 2010; Mardas et al, 2011; Misch, 2010; Wallace, 2015; Wallace et al, 2014).…”

“…Many reports over the past decade have attempted to minimize these effects via a variety of procedures including collagen barrier membranes, bone grafting materials and growth factors (Bayat, Momen Heravi, Mahmoudi, & Bahrami, 2015; Brkovic et al, 2008; Brkovic et al, 2012; Coomes et al, 2014; Fiorellini et al, 2005; Mardas, Chadha, & Donos, 2010; Mardas, D'Aiuto, Mezzomo, Arzoumanidi, & Donos, 2011; Misch, 2010; Wallace, 2015; Wallace, Pikos, & Prasad, 2014). Despite this, tooth loss remains a prominent challenge, and no single therapy has been shown capable of predictably preventing dimensional bone‐changes following extraction (De Risi, Clementini, Vittorini, Mannocci, & De Sanctis, 2015; Jambhekar, Kernen, & Bidra, 2015; Moraschini & Barboza, 2016; Morjaria, Wilson, & Palmer, 2014; Spagnoli & Choi, 2013; Tan, Wong, Wong, & Lang, 2012). …”

Flapless Dental Implant: Contemporary Trends in Literature Coverage

“…Difficulty of keratinized gum which is lack of keratinized gum does not influence on the success of implants in the long term, the currently most-followed trend is that, although it is not essential, the failure rates are higher when there is little or no keratinized gum around the implant [5].…”

“…The cause of the increased initial bone loss within the first year after insertion in not fully understood, and based on data available to date there is evidence that effect of surgical trauma caused by raising a mucroperiosteal flab is a subject of scientific investigation [1][2][3][4] The idea that the attendant temporary interruption of the blood supply to the outer layers of the bone could possibly cause increased alveolar ridge resorption [1][2][3][4][5] Maier reported a prospective cohort study for measurement of a mean cumulative crestal bone loss after one year of implant placement with flapped or flapless surgery. It was reported that flapless implant insertion caused less peri-implant loss than implant insertion with flap preparation.…”