2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-019-0772-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and Genomic Considerations for Variant Histology in Bladder Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mitra et al (15), in a recent multiinstitutional study, analyzed 41 patients with micropapillary urothelial carcinoma (MUC) treated with AC, who obtained improved recurrence free survival and OS (P<0.01) from different AC regimens. The lack of a benefit in survival outcomes from AC in the SCC, the sarcomatoid differentiation and the adenocarcinoma is aligned with previous discoveries and underlines the limited effectiveness of chemotherapy regimens in these aggressive entities (16)(17)(18). Conversely, the absence of a significant improvement from AC in OS in the neuroendocrine variant is in contrast with previous results, which have highlighted the chemosensitive nature of this histology, both in the neoadjuvant and the adjuvant setting (17).…”
Section: Editorial Commentarysupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mitra et al (15), in a recent multiinstitutional study, analyzed 41 patients with micropapillary urothelial carcinoma (MUC) treated with AC, who obtained improved recurrence free survival and OS (P<0.01) from different AC regimens. The lack of a benefit in survival outcomes from AC in the SCC, the sarcomatoid differentiation and the adenocarcinoma is aligned with previous discoveries and underlines the limited effectiveness of chemotherapy regimens in these aggressive entities (16)(17)(18). Conversely, the absence of a significant improvement from AC in OS in the neuroendocrine variant is in contrast with previous results, which have highlighted the chemosensitive nature of this histology, both in the neoadjuvant and the adjuvant setting (17).…”
Section: Editorial Commentarysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…A sub stratification per type of chemotherapy regimen might help to identify better performing drug combinations. Fifth, this study lacks insight about molecular features, which are increasingly demonstrating a potential role in the diagnostic workup, prognosis definition and treatment selection (18,25). Due to these limitations, it is not possible to infer generalizable conclusions from this investigation.…”
Section: Editorial Commentarymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Data from the literature point out that consensus agreement between pathologists in recognizing VH-UC is less than optimal, even when asking renowned experts in the field. Diagnosing VH-UC at TURB may be further affected by many factors, including the availability of only a small amount of tissue with inherent risk of undersampling, the frequent occurrence of coagulation artifacts, and tumor heterogeneity [24,34,35]. In keeping with this, there have been discordant results when evaluating the accuracy of TURB in assessing the occurrence and type of VH.…”
Section: Bc With Vh: Overall Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of such evidence, early RC is currently advocated as the optimal treatment option for MV-NMIBC over conservative therapy [33,37,42,45,52,98,109,121,124,125], with NAC for select patients [34]. Accordingly, a survey developed by the Translational Science Working Group of the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network-sponsored think tank meeting distributed to members of the Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) reported that the early RC would be the treatment choice of cT1 MV-UC for 81% of the participants [126], and the statement proposing immediate RC and lymphadenectomy for T1 HG MV-UC (diagnosed upon complete TUR and/or re-TUR) was accepted with an agreement rate as high as 86% in a recent EAU-ESMO consensus meeting [78].…”
Section: Micropapillary Variantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variant histology carries worse prognosis than pure UC. These tumors present at a higher stage and are more likely to develop metastatic disease [3]. The outcomes varied with divergent histologies and appropriate treatment should be based on the histological finding [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%