2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and Functional Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Cortical Button Fixation Versus Transfemoral Suspensory Fixation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus laxity tests performed at 02 year follow-up was statistically significant suggesting improvement in the stability of knee between pre-operative and post-operative status of patients in our study. These results are comparable to the results achieved by various other authors Beynnon et al [17] Saccomanno et al [33] and Poolman et al [34] Functional Outcome H. E. Bourke et al [35] reported the outcome of 'isolated' anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures treated with anatomical endoscopic reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft at a mean of 15 years. A total of 152 patients underwent subjective assessment at 15 years.…”
Section: Laxity Testssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Thus laxity tests performed at 02 year follow-up was statistically significant suggesting improvement in the stability of knee between pre-operative and post-operative status of patients in our study. These results are comparable to the results achieved by various other authors Beynnon et al [17] Saccomanno et al [33] and Poolman et al [34] Functional Outcome H. E. Bourke et al [35] reported the outcome of 'isolated' anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures treated with anatomical endoscopic reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft at a mean of 15 years. A total of 152 patients underwent subjective assessment at 15 years.…”
Section: Laxity Testssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Many studies showed no significant difference in the use of suspension devices and interference screws to fix the ACL graft at the femoral side, nor in their functional scores and biomechanical results. However, different fixation devices used between the femoral and tibial tunnels can lead to different signal intensities [52][53][54]. The effect of different fixation devices between the femoral and tibial tunnels on the difference in signal intensities is unclear, due to lack of studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Only one study has shown a correlation between widening and knee laxity as measured by KT-1000 on the rotational stability measured by the pivot shift test, with a higher laxity in the patients that were affected of tunnel widening [10]. In a review by Saccomanno et al [26], five Level 1 or Level 2 studies containing 317 patients were compared. They looked at the clinical and functional outcome of different fixation devices on the femoral side and concluded that the amount of tunnel widening was not found to affect the clinical results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%