Abstract:S: By linking youths with significant mental health needs to existing community-based services, it appears possible both to ameliorate psychopathology and to reduce delinquency.
“…The recommended levels of care consider milieu intensity and service intensity. A more recent instrument, the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strength instrument (CANS), was patterned after the CASPI and has demonstrated concurrent reliability in field testing, and has been used to evaluate service use within public mental health and juvenile justice systems (Lyons, Griffith, Quintenz, Jenuwine, & Sasha, 2003;Lyons et al, 2004). However, both of these instruments are dependent on diagnostic categorization, which is often difficult to achieve in children due to lack of diagnostic clarity as well as high rates of co-morbidities.…”
Section: In Live System Of Care Clinical Settings the Calocus/casii mentioning
The Child and Adolescent Level of Care System/Child and Adolescent ServiceIntensity Instrument (CALOCUS/ CASII) is designed to help determine the intensity of services needed for a child served in a mental health system of care. The instrument contains eight dimensions that are rated following a comprehensive clinical evaluation. The dimensions are risk of harm, functionality, co-morbidity (psychiatric, substance abuse, development disability and medical), environmental stressors, environmental supports, the child's resiliency, and the child and family's willingness to engage in treatment. An algorithm connects the ratings to a level of care recommendation. The instrument specifies six levels of care defined flexibly enough to consider whatever services are available. The results of psychometric testing using raters with a broad range of clinical experience and training from four different systems of care around the country are presented. The testing demonstrates excellent reliability when rating vignettes. Using children and adolescents
“…The recommended levels of care consider milieu intensity and service intensity. A more recent instrument, the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strength instrument (CANS), was patterned after the CASPI and has demonstrated concurrent reliability in field testing, and has been used to evaluate service use within public mental health and juvenile justice systems (Lyons, Griffith, Quintenz, Jenuwine, & Sasha, 2003;Lyons et al, 2004). However, both of these instruments are dependent on diagnostic categorization, which is often difficult to achieve in children due to lack of diagnostic clarity as well as high rates of co-morbidities.…”
Section: In Live System Of Care Clinical Settings the Calocus/casii mentioning
The Child and Adolescent Level of Care System/Child and Adolescent ServiceIntensity Instrument (CALOCUS/ CASII) is designed to help determine the intensity of services needed for a child served in a mental health system of care. The instrument contains eight dimensions that are rated following a comprehensive clinical evaluation. The dimensions are risk of harm, functionality, co-morbidity (psychiatric, substance abuse, development disability and medical), environmental stressors, environmental supports, the child's resiliency, and the child and family's willingness to engage in treatment. An algorithm connects the ratings to a level of care recommendation. The instrument specifies six levels of care defined flexibly enough to consider whatever services are available. The results of psychometric testing using raters with a broad range of clinical experience and training from four different systems of care around the country are presented. The testing demonstrates excellent reliability when rating vignettes. Using children and adolescents
“…No study (that I have found) has specifically examined whether DAs intentionally drop out of community-based services or are forced to terminate services in response to placement in detention/prison or other treatment barriers. While it is likely a combination of several factors, the important point is that many DAs are not receiving mental health or substance-related services postdetention and are failing to benefit from the positive impacts of community-based mental health interventions (Hoeve et al, 2013;Lyons et al, 2003). …”
Section: Timing Of Treatment Services and Continuity Of Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that approximately 87.8% of the DAs with prior treatment obtained these treatment services within the two years prior to being admitted into detention, so these youth likely remember their providers, are familiar with treatment, know where to seek treatment, etc., which eliminates many treatment barriers that may prevent DAs from seeking treatment after release from detention. Finally, the ease of service planning may account for the link between pre-and post-detention treatment; it may be easier for staff within the juvenile justice system to coordinate care with DAs' current (or past providers) in the community and make arrangements for these youth to continue services upon release from detention versus independently searching and finding providers for youth with no history of prior treatment (Lyons et al, 2003;Riley, 2014). …”
Section: Aim 2 Group Differences: Mental Health Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This markedly low prevalence estimate reflects a missed opportunity, since treatment can potentially improve symptomology, enhance individual and family functioning, and reduce recidivism (Lipsey, 2009;Lyons et al, 2003;Sexton & Turner, 2010). …”
“…Bu çalışmalarda suçun gelişimi, suçun tekrarı ve bireyin topluma yeniden kazandırılması sürecinde ruhsal hastalıkların önemli etkisinin olduğu vurgulanmaktadır (2,3). Bu konuda giderek artan bilgilere rağmen psikiyatrik hastalıkların sıklığına yönelik veriler arasında ciddi uyumsuzluklar dikkati çekmektedir.…”
Objective:Robbery is a crime that has an increasing incidence among children and adolescents in Turkiye. In this study we investigated the distribution of psychiatric diagnoses, sociodemographic and neuropsychological features of male adolescents who dragged into robbery.Methods:
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.