Clinical and Economic Impact of Remote Monitoring on the Follow-Up of Patients with Implantable Electronic Cardiovascular Devices: An Observational Study

Abstract

Traditional follow-up of patients with cardiovascular devices is still an activity that, in addition to serving an increasing population, requires a considerable amount of time and specialized human and technical resources. Our aim was to evaluate the applicability of the CareLink(®) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) remote monitoring system as a complementary option to the follow-up of patients with implanted devices, between in-office visits. Evaluated outcomes included both clinical (event detection and time to diagnosis) and nonclinical (patient's satisfaction and economic costs) aspects. An observational, longitudinal, prospective study was conducted with patients from a Portuguese central hospital sampled by convenience during 1 week (43 patients). Data were collected in four moments: two in-office visits and two remote evaluations, reproducing 1 year of clinical follow-up. Data sources included health records, implant reports, initial demographic data collection, follow-up printouts, and a questionnaire. After selection criteria were verified, 15 patients (11 men [73%]) were included, 63.4±10.8 years old, representing 14.0±6.3 implant months. Clinically, 15 events were detected (9 by remote monitoring and 6 by patient-initiated activation), of which only 9 were symptomatic. We verified that remote monitoring could detect both symptomatic and asymptomatic events, whereas patient-initiated activation only detected symptomatic ones (p=0.028). Moreover, the mean diagnosis anticipation in patients with events was approximately 58 days (p<0.001). In nonclinical terms, we observed high or very high satisfaction (67% and 33%, respectively) with using remote monitoring technology, but still 8 patients (53%) stated they preferred in-office visits. Finally, the introduction of remote monitoring technology has the ability to reduce total follow-up costs for patients by 25%. We conclude that the use of this system constitutes a viable complementary option to the follow-up of patients with implantable devices, between in-office visits.

Telemedicine and primary care obesity management in rural areas – innovative approach for older adults?

“…Older adults are the fastest growing population using eHealth devices [95] yet may still prefer face-to-face visits [97] making newer conventional models difficult to adopt in this population. Due to the less-personal feel of the telemedicine approach, there are inherent challenges to building rapport with patients which can be perceived as a major barrier to older adults.…”

What Features and Functions Are Desired in Telemedical Services Targeted at Polish Older Adults Delivered by Wearable Medical Devices?—Pre-COVID-19 Flashback

“…The systematic review of virtual visits was presented by Husebø et al [ 24 ]. Another aspect could be the fact that older people still prefer face-to-face visits what makes newer models of providing e-health very challenging to adopt among this age group [ 25 ]. The respondents highlighted that this idea should be developed, and doctors should be more interested in new technologies.…”

Non-pharmacological approaches applied in the control of cardiovascular diseases / Estratégias não medicamentosas utilizadas no controle de doenças cardiovasculares / Enfoques no farmacológicos aplicados en el control de las enfermedades cardiovasculares

“…Um estudo revelou suas vantagens na detecção antecipada de eventos, em que a expectativa média de diagnóstico em pacientes que observaram eventos sintomáticos ou não, é de aproximadamente 58 dias (p <0,001), permitindo gerenciar e tratar dois meses antes da próxima consulta médica agendada (39) .…”