2020
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and economic impact of treated CMV infection in adult CMV‐seropositive patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Abstract: Objective Recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HCT) with positive cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The primary objective of this study was to assess the association between treated CMV infection and overall mortality within 1 year after allo‐HCT in adult CMV‐seropositive Recipients (R+). Secondary objectives included overall 5‐year mortality after allo‐HCT, risk factors for treated CMV infection, associations between treated CMV … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pre-emptive treatment for CMV following HCT is generally effective in preventing CMV tissue-invasive disease (ie, end-organ disease) but is associated with dose-limiting toxicities (eg, myelotoxicity for valganciclovir/ganciclovir and renal toxicity for foscarnet and cidofovir [ 5–9 ]), often requiring dose adjustment, interruption, or cycling of therapies, thereby impacting CMV recurrence and patient outcomes [ 10 , 11 ]. Additionally, management of treatment-related toxicities with growth-factor support, hydration, intensive electrolyte monitoring, and replacement poses a substantial burden on both the healthcare system and patients [ 3 , 10 ]. Therefore, there is a need for new agents with fewer safety concerns for CMV management in HCT recipients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-emptive treatment for CMV following HCT is generally effective in preventing CMV tissue-invasive disease (ie, end-organ disease) but is associated with dose-limiting toxicities (eg, myelotoxicity for valganciclovir/ganciclovir and renal toxicity for foscarnet and cidofovir [ 5–9 ]), often requiring dose adjustment, interruption, or cycling of therapies, thereby impacting CMV recurrence and patient outcomes [ 10 , 11 ]. Additionally, management of treatment-related toxicities with growth-factor support, hydration, intensive electrolyte monitoring, and replacement poses a substantial burden on both the healthcare system and patients [ 3 , 10 ]. Therefore, there is a need for new agents with fewer safety concerns for CMV management in HCT recipients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, overall, a dynamic strategy that adapts to each patient's changing risk could make letermovir more cost-effective. 47 , 48 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMV is the most typical post-transplant viral infection. Patients who received MAC had a higher risk of getting infected with CMV than those who received NMA or RIC ( 91 ), and those who used much of cortisol hormone, cyclosporin, ATG, or other immunosuppression had a higher risk as well. Because their immune systems are more weakened and CMV disease has a worse prognosis, older people are more prone to get infect with it.…”
Section: Management Of Post-transplant Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%