“…Many studies have been conducted to predict the EGFR mutation status of lung cancer based on imaging, stipulating that the EGFR mutation is associated with females and non-smokers. Radiological features associated with EGFR mutation are ground-glass attenuation of the tumor, the presence of air bronchogram, vascular convergence, spiculated margin, and pleural retraction [16] . On the other hand, wild-type EGFR tend to be linked to male and smoking [17] and is less likely to cause diffuse metastatic process [18] .…”
“…Many studies have been conducted to predict the EGFR mutation status of lung cancer based on imaging, stipulating that the EGFR mutation is associated with females and non-smokers. Radiological features associated with EGFR mutation are ground-glass attenuation of the tumor, the presence of air bronchogram, vascular convergence, spiculated margin, and pleural retraction [16] . On the other hand, wild-type EGFR tend to be linked to male and smoking [17] and is less likely to cause diffuse metastatic process [18] .…”
“…In this study, the EGFR mutation rate of lung adenocarcinoma patients was 60.8%, and the mutant group was more likely to have imaging signs such as bronchial sign, pleural indentation sign, and vessel convergence sign. A meta‐analysis 27 also pointed out that some CT imaging features were risk factors for EGFR mutation in NSCLC patients. In clinical practice, the detection rate of EGFR mutation is much lower than expected due to the lack of tumor specimens, poor quality of specimens, and economic reasons 13,28 .…”
Background
To investigate the association between squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCAg) level and epidermal growth factor receptor (
EGFR
) mutation status in Chinese lung adenocarcinoma patients.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 293 patients with lung adenocarcinoma, divided into
EGFR
mutant group (
n
= 178) and
EGFR
wild‐type group (
n
= 115). The general data and laboratory parameters of the two groups were compared. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression to analyze the association between SCCAg level and
EGFR
mutation. Generalized additive model was used for curve fitting, and a hierarchical binary logistic regression model was used for interaction analysis.
Results
Squamous cell carcinoma antigen level in the
EGFR
wild‐type group was significantly higher than that in the mutant group (
p
< 0.001). After adjusting for confounding factors, we found that elevated SCCAg was associated with a lower probability of
EGFR
mutation, with an OR of 0.717 (95% CI: 0.543–0.947,
p
= 0.019). For the tripartite SCCAg groups, the increasing trend of SCCAg was significantly associated with the decreasing probability of
EGFR
mutation (
p
for trend = 0.015), especially for Tertile 3 versus Tertile 1 (OR = 0.505; 95% CI: 0.258–0.986;
p
= 0.045). Curve fitting showed that there was an approximate linear negative relationship between continuous SCCAg and
EGFR
mutation probability (
p
= 0.020), which was first flattened and then decreased (
p
< 0.001). The association between the two was consistent among different subgroups, suggesting no interaction (all
p
> 0.05).
Conclusion
There is a negative association between SCCAg level and
EGFR
mutation probability in Chinese lung adenocarcinoma patients.
“…Detecting these two oncogenic driver mutations has become essential in the treatment of NSCLC, specifically adenocarcinoma [ 6 ], as both mutations are sensitive to drugs that target EGFR [ 2 ], and screening for these mutations predict which patients will respond to therapy [ 7 ]. Advances in research demonstrated that EGFR mutations are linked to specific risk factors such as the absence of smoking and female sex, and radiological imaging features such as ground-glass opacities (GGO), air bronchogram, vascular convergence, pleural retraction, spiculation [ 5 , 8 , 9 ].…”
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations in lung adenocarcinoma have been previously associated with specific clinical characteristics and Computed Tomography (CT) patterns. However, associations among individual EGFR mutations have not been evaluated. We aim to differentiate if the most common EGFR mutations (exon 21 and 19) are related to specific clinical characteristics or CT patterns. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 5 databases were conducted with literature from January 2002 to July 2021. Eligible studies were of an experimental or observational design that included lung adenocarcinoma patients with confirmed EGFR exon mutations (21 and 19) and associated clinical characteristics and CT imaging patterns. Quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The association between clinical and CT patterns and EGFR exon mutations 21 and 19 was evaluated using odds ratios (OR) and then pooled and analyzed with a fixed or random-effects model. This study follows the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.
A total of 12 retrospective diagnostic accuracy studies were included. Pooled analysis showed that characteristics such as absence of smoking status (OR 1.29 [95% CI 0.97 - 1.70]), and female sex (OR 1.23 [95% CI 0.83 - 1.82]); and CT patterns such as Ground Glass Opacities (GGO) (OR 1.03 [95% CI 0.78 -1.34]), air bronchogram (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.44 -1.39]), pleural retraction (OR 0.83 [95% CI 0.53 - 1.28]), and spiculation (OR 0.80 [95% CI 0.48 - 1.31]) were not significantly associated to a specific mutation. Specific EGFR exon 21 and 19 mutations cannot be differentiated through characteristics (absence of smoking status and female sex) or radiological patterns (GGO, air bronchogram, pleural retraction, and speculation). There is limited data to assess if early disease stage or vascular convergence aids in differentiating exon 21 from 19 mutations in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.