2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and coronary haemodynamic determinants of recurrent chest pain in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease — A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, anatomic testing (e.g., computed tomographic coronary angiography) may result in false reassurance for patients with no obstructive CAD but underlying MVA and/or VSA. These patients are predominantly women ( 30 ). Discontinuation of therapy by protocol in patients with undiagnosed MVA may be one explanation for why management guided by computed tomographic coronary angiography is associated with more angina and worse health-related quality of life compared with standard care ( 31 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, anatomic testing (e.g., computed tomographic coronary angiography) may result in false reassurance for patients with no obstructive CAD but underlying MVA and/or VSA. These patients are predominantly women ( 30 ). Discontinuation of therapy by protocol in patients with undiagnosed MVA may be one explanation for why management guided by computed tomographic coronary angiography is associated with more angina and worse health-related quality of life compared with standard care ( 31 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimal MR is calculated as the ratio of distal coronary pressure to distal coronary flow and during maximal coronary vasodilatation and reflects the intrinsic resistance of the coronary microvasculature blood flow as a marker of structural microvascular alterations ( 41 ). Minimal MR is expressed by the hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR), where HMR >1.9 is considered abnormal and used for diagnosing CMD ( 42 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MG is consultant for Circle CVI ( 42 ). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.…”
Section: Conflict Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An IMR, calculated as distal coronary pressure at maximal hyperemia multiplied by hyperemic mean index time, greater than or equal to 25 based upon thermodilution is consistent with microvascular dysfunction [ 61 ]. An HMR, calculated by dividing intracoronary pressure by hyperemic flow velocity, greater than 1.9 (odds ratio (OR) 15.6, 95% CI: 2.1–114, p = 0.007) based upon PET and doppler is an independent predictor of recurrent chest pain [ 62 ]. Lastly, flow-limiting CAD can be assessed by FFR, which is the ratio of mean distal coronary pressure to mean aortic pressure at maximal hyperemia; a value of less than or equal to 0.80 is abnormal [ 63 ].…”
Section: Ischemia With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery (Inoca) Disease and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction (Cmd)mentioning
confidence: 99%