2010
DOI: 10.1007/dcr.0b013e3181e10b0e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Algorithms for the Surgical Management of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Abstract: Improvements in radiological imaging modalities and technical improvements in surgical and reconstructive options have facilitated more accurate staging, better selection of patients for surgery, reduced morbidity and mortality, and higher R0 resections. Optimal management is in specialist units with a multidisciplinary approach with the use of multimodal therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Radical (R0) resection of LR is associated with at least twice higher survival than in non-radical (R1/R2) resection and remains the treatment of choice [21,22]. The tumor-free resection margin is a favorable prognostic factor for improved local control and overall survival [19][20][21][23][24][25][26]. In our study the survival time of patients after R0 resection was longer in comparison to non-radical resection group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Radical (R0) resection of LR is associated with at least twice higher survival than in non-radical (R1/R2) resection and remains the treatment of choice [21,22]. The tumor-free resection margin is a favorable prognostic factor for improved local control and overall survival [19][20][21][23][24][25][26]. In our study the survival time of patients after R0 resection was longer in comparison to non-radical resection group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In our analysis, the staging of rectal cancer recurrence was assessed according to the modified Wanebo classification. The infiltration of side walls is associated with worse outcomes and obtaining radical resection is then significantly reduced [24,35]. Median survival in patients with M0, R0 resection with IORT and in stage Tr 1-4 of the Wanebo classification was 26 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] Cerrahi veya palyasyon bu durumda standart tedavi kabul edilirken [7,8,24] genellikle uygunlanabilir bir yöntem değildir. [25] Daha önce EBRT alsın ya da almasın bu hastalar için SBRT bir seçenek olarak gö-rülmektedir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Lograr una resección R0 es el factor pronóstico más importante, independiente incluso del tipo de RL y se logra en alrededor del 50% de los pacientes intervenidos, es decir, alrededor del 20% del global de pacientes con diagnóstico de una RL 4,5,12,17,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26] . Se considera una contraindicación formal de cirugía de salvataje los pacientes con pelvis congelada con compromiso de la pared lateral, de la escotadura ciática, de los vasos ilíacos con edema de la extremidad, la invasión de S1-S2 y la presencia de enfermedad diseminada 27 .…”
Section: Factores Quirúrgicosunclassified