2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical activity of sunitinib rechallenge in metastatic renal cell carcinoma—Results of the REchallenge with SUnitinib in MEtastatic RCC (RESUME) Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
24
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The above articles all concluded that sunitinib rechallenge is an effective and safe treatment choice for patients who relapsed after sunitinib and subsequent TKIs and/or mTOR inhibitors. The treatment type between the two sunitinib exposures seemed to be indifferent regarding the efficacy of rechallenged sunitinib; however, only our report and two other authors presented cases when TKIs (other than sunitinib) were applied [ 9 , 10 ]. The above statement is strengthened by the above-mentioned prospective study [ 15 ] the preliminary results of which were very similar to that of other retrospective studies (Table 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above articles all concluded that sunitinib rechallenge is an effective and safe treatment choice for patients who relapsed after sunitinib and subsequent TKIs and/or mTOR inhibitors. The treatment type between the two sunitinib exposures seemed to be indifferent regarding the efficacy of rechallenged sunitinib; however, only our report and two other authors presented cases when TKIs (other than sunitinib) were applied [ 9 , 10 ]. The above statement is strengthened by the above-mentioned prospective study [ 15 ] the preliminary results of which were very similar to that of other retrospective studies (Table 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Oudard et al [ 9 ] reported significantly longer PFS of rechallenged sunitinib for patients having longer PFS for the first sunitinib. Compared to our study (29%) they had many more patients (78%) receiving both mTOR and TKI between sunitinib treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms of sunitinib resistance can be roughly divided into the following: activation of the angiogenic signalling pathway, changes in the tumour microenvironment, increase in tumour invasion and metastasis, and the role of microRNAs and lncRNAs in the activation of other signal bypasses 43. Pro-angiogenic factors, such as Ang2, FGF, and PDGF, are upregulated in most cases of sunitinib resistance 44, 45. In fact, anti-angiogenic-induced hypoxia activates the mTOR pathway and induces HIF production, which activates the transcription HRE-containing genes such as VEGF, PDGF, TGF-α, EPO, MMP-1, EGFR, HGFR/cMET, cyclin D1, and SDF1 and its receptor CXCR4 46.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixed retrospective and prospective REchallenge with SUnitinib in MEtastatic RCC (RESUME) Study has evaluated the efficacy, as measured by PFS, and safety of sunitinib rechallenge in mRCC patients who received first-line sunitinib, then one or more lines of different targeted treatments, followed by further sunitinib. 57 A total of 28 patients (54% of 52 patients eveluated) had a complete ( n = 1) or partial response (PR) with first-line sunitinib, and 8 patients (15%) achieved a PR upon sunitinib rechallenge. Median PFS with first-line sunitinib was 18.4 months (95% CI: 12.5–23.7) and 7.9 months (95% CI: 5.4–13.2) with sunitinib rechallenge.…”
Section: Sunitinib Rechallengementioning
confidence: 99%