ClinGen Pathogenicity Calculator: a configurable system for assessing pathogenicity of genetic variants

Abstract

BackgroundThe success of the clinical use of sequencing based tests (from single gene to genomes) depends on the accuracy and consistency of variant interpretation. Aiming to improve the interpretation process through practice guidelines, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) have published standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants. However, manual application of the guidelines is tedious and prone to human error. Web-based tools and software systems may not only address this problem but also document reasoning and supporting evidence, thus enabling transparency of evidence-based reasoning and resolution of discordant interpretations.ResultsIn this report, we describe the design, implementation, and initial testing of the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Pathogenicity Calculator, a configurable system and web service for the assessment of pathogenicity of Mendelian germline sequence variants. The system allows users to enter the applicable ACMG/AMP-style evidence tags for a specific allele with links to supporting data for each tag and generate guideline-based pathogenicity assessment for the allele. Through automation and comprehensive documentation of evidence codes, the system facilitates more accurate application of the ACMG/AMP guidelines, improves standardization in variant classification, and facilitates collaborative resolution of discordances. The rules of reasoning are configurable with gene-specific or disease-specific guideline variations (e.g. cardiomyopathy-specific frequency thresholds and functional assays). The software is modular, equipped with robust application program interfaces (APIs), and available under a free open source license and as a cloud-hosted web service, thus facilitating both stand-alone use and integration with existing variant curation and interpretation systems. The Pathogenicity Calculator is accessible at http://calculator.clinicalgenome.org.ConclusionsBy enabling evidence-based reasoning about the pathogenicity of genetic variants and by documenting supporting evidence, the Calculator contributes toward the creation of a knowledge commons and more accurate interpretation of sequence variants in research and clinical care.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13073-016-0391-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

New workflow for classification of genetic variants’ pathogenicity applied to hereditary recurrent fevers by the International Study Group for Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases (INSAID)

“…Such well-known examples in the HRF genes are c.442G>C encoding p.Glu148Gln in the MEFV gene,25 26 c.362G>A encoding p.Arg121Gln (historically named R92Q) in the TNFRSF1A gene27–29 and c.592G>A and c.2107C>A encoding p.Val198Met and p.Gln703Lys in the NLRP3 gene, respectively 30–32. Patel et al 33 recently configured a pathogenicity calculator that stores and summarises input collected from single or several classifiers, according to the ACMG guidelines. This transparency-based web tool, designed to organise and harmonise the methodology and resources of pathogenicity assessment, will help to sort conflicting interpretations, yet ultimately the final classification requires a process supporting and leading to expert consensus.…”

Distinguishing pathogenic mutations from background genetic noise in cardiology: The use of large genome databases for genetic interpretation

“…Similar efforts are ongoing for other disease‐gene sets . Secondly, the ClinGen project and the recently published InterVar have both developed automated pathogenicity tools, which allows researchers to partly automate the formal reasoning, which can eliminate the subjective process of deciding related to rule application and calculates conclusions based on latest evidence on a given variant.…”

AVADA Enables Automated Genetic Variant Curation Directly from the Full Text Literature

“…While the approach cannot currently replicate manual curation efforts, it is nevertheless well suited to support the work of manual curators in improving and extending existing variant databases. Blending the AVADA automatic variant curation approach with manual verification should facilitate rapid variant classification 42 and the cost-effective annotation of patient variants.…”