2010
DOI: 10.54302/mausam.v61i3.840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climatological and synoptic aspect of hailstorm and squall over Guwahati Airport during pre-monsoon season

Abstract: Premonsoon season in north-east India is known for thunderstorm activity with moderate to heavy rain, gusty wind, squall and sometimes with the occurrences of hail fall. In this paper an attempt has been made to find out the climatological and synoptical aspects of hailstorms as well as squall over Guwahati Airport (26.18° N, 91.75° E) during Premonsoon season. 20 years data from 1987 to 2006 have been analyzed. The frequency of hail and squall during premonsoon season is observed to be 1.35 and 3.65 respectiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 1898, numerous works on the climatology of hailstorms have been carried out in the Indian subcontinent by using the available ground‐based hail‐reporting data (Eliot, 1898; Ramdas et al ., 1938; Frisby and Sansom, 1967; Gokhale, 1975; Philip and Daniel, 1976; Chaudhury and Banerjee, 1983; De et al ., 2005; Biswas et al ., 2010; Das et al ., 2010; Chattopadhyay et al ., 2017). However, reporting data have some uncertainties: (a) the times and locations of hailstorms may not be precise, (b) the reports may be dominated by graupel, (c) the hailstorms far from reporting stations could be omitted, and (d) percentage of false‐alarm and missed hailstorms in the reports could not be known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1898, numerous works on the climatology of hailstorms have been carried out in the Indian subcontinent by using the available ground‐based hail‐reporting data (Eliot, 1898; Ramdas et al ., 1938; Frisby and Sansom, 1967; Gokhale, 1975; Philip and Daniel, 1976; Chaudhury and Banerjee, 1983; De et al ., 2005; Biswas et al ., 2010; Das et al ., 2010; Chattopadhyay et al ., 2017). However, reporting data have some uncertainties: (a) the times and locations of hailstorms may not be precise, (b) the reports may be dominated by graupel, (c) the hailstorms far from reporting stations could be omitted, and (d) percentage of false‐alarm and missed hailstorms in the reports could not be known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%