2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.11.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climatic control on the growth of gigantic gypsum crystals within hypogenic caves (Naica mine, Mexico)?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1). This lack of reactivity can be understood in terms of growth kinetics, due to the high activation barrier [70.7 AE 5.0 kJ∕mol (18)] for incorporation of molecules in the f010g face, at 20°C the step kinetic coefficient of the f010g face of gypsum is only 5.1 × 10 −3 cm∕s (19), and in the case of a pure solution (CaSOA 4 dissolved in H 2 O) with a supersaturation index of 0.01 a step velocity of <0.03 nm∕s is expected (19). Taking into account that the lateral resolution limit of the PSI system is theoretically ≈1.3 μm, although in a practical sense this resolution limit is more likely around 3 μm due to intrinsic noise in the PSI images, more than 1,500 min of observation would be necessary to unmistakably discern any step movement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1). This lack of reactivity can be understood in terms of growth kinetics, due to the high activation barrier [70.7 AE 5.0 kJ∕mol (18)] for incorporation of molecules in the f010g face, at 20°C the step kinetic coefficient of the f010g face of gypsum is only 5.1 × 10 −3 cm∕s (19), and in the case of a pure solution (CaSOA 4 dissolved in H 2 O) with a supersaturation index of 0.01 a step velocity of <0.03 nm∕s is expected (19). Taking into account that the lateral resolution limit of the PSI system is theoretically ≈1.3 μm, although in a practical sense this resolution limit is more likely around 3 μm due to intrinsic noise in the PSI images, more than 1,500 min of observation would be necessary to unmistakably discern any step movement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the samples were in position a mixture of water and CO 2 was introduced in the chamber as a fine fog. The aim of this procedure was to rapidly produce an aggressive attack over the crystal surface and the possible deposition of a calcium carbonate layer [7]. To ensure the maximum production of carbonic acid, the CO 2 were dissolved by bubbling it into distilled water at room temperature.…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conditions at which the structures have developed have been analyzed by several research groups, emphasizing on the fact that this unique conditions are not likely to repeat somewhere around the world [6]. In addition, new structures like a candle shaped ones, have been described derived from the novel hydric conditions of the caves [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2); t�us t�e average yearly deposition corresponds to 0.0097 g/cm 2 yr, w�ic� is equivalent to an average linear growt� rate of 0.042 mm/yr or 0.058 mM/cm 2 yr. At any rate, t�is value cannot be directly used to evaluate t�e age of t�e largest crystals, because a fundamental parameter affecting t�e crystal growt� rate �as not yet been considered: t�e temperature inside t�e vessel. In fact t�e present temperature inside t�e device is lower t�an t�at w�ic� c�aracterized t�e caves during t�e growt� of t�eir giant crystals: 51 °C in t�e presentday t�ermal spring instead of 57 °C in t�e past inside t�e caves (Garofalo et al 2010). The an�ydrite/gypsum solubility difference is 0.2 mM/L at 57 °C, w�ereas it increases to a value of 2.2 mM/L at 51 °C (Fig.…”
Section: Fig 5: Correlation Between Measured Gypsum Overgrowth and Tmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However t�e extrapolated data from t�e first TIMS measurement suffer from a rat�er large uncertainty, because t�ey are related to crystal growt� during a period (t�e last 40,000 years) in w�ic� t�e groundwater level inside t�e Naica ridge started oscillating as strong differences in t�e p�ysico-c�emical (mainly temperature and salinity) parameters of t�e fluid inclusions seem to indicate (Garofalo et al 2010).…”
Section: Fig 5: Correlation Between Measured Gypsum Overgrowth and Tmentioning
confidence: 99%