2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate visuals: A mixed methods investigation of public perceptions of climate images in three countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
73
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, research shows that politicians and protesters are seen as ineffective and alienating, and produce the least positive reactions from viewers (Chapman et al, ; Leviston et al, ; Metag et al, ). Further, while some NGOs go to lengths to provide staged protests and stunts—and these attract a lot of media attention (Wozniak et al, )—in focus groups, people preferred candid, credible photos (Chapman et al, ).…”
Section: Ngo Advocacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, research shows that politicians and protesters are seen as ineffective and alienating, and produce the least positive reactions from viewers (Chapman et al, ; Leviston et al, ; Metag et al, ). Further, while some NGOs go to lengths to provide staged protests and stunts—and these attract a lot of media attention (Wozniak et al, )—in focus groups, people preferred candid, credible photos (Chapman et al, ).…”
Section: Ngo Advocacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there is still an unresolved tension between affective and motivational/behavioral responses to climate change imagery. Further, the indicators used (e.g., affective reactions, efficacy and salience) vary considerably in content and measurement from study to study (Chapman et al, ; O'Neill et al, ). Researchers studying reactions to visual imagery should strive for greater measurement precision and operationalization across studies, while also seeking to understand the reasons for potentially divergent responses across methodologies.…”
Section: Gaps and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we need to think carefully about the types of images we use and the messages we are sending. Commonly used climate change symbols such as polar bears and melting ice caps, for instance, may be easily recognised, but frame climate change as a far-away issue, remote from everyday behaviour (Chapman et al 2016). Rigorous evaluation is needed to empirically validate the methods that are used to change behaviour across different contexts, as there can often be unexpected results (Thomas-Walters and Raihani 2017).…”
Section: And the Society For Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most directly related to this study, respondents viewed images that depicted climate solutions positively, although these images did not motivate them to take action around climate change (Chapman et al, 2016).…”
Section: Climate Change Visualsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Images can engage audiences by evoking emotions, facilitating memory, and transmitting cultural meaning (O'Neill & Smith, 2014). While research on verbal and written climate communication has proliferated in recent years, research on visual climate communication has lagged (Chapman, Corner, Webster, & Markowitz, 2016;O'Neill & Smith, 2014). Such research has usually concentrated on images projected through traditional mass media, such as newspapers (DiFrancesco & Young, 2011;Duan, Zwickle, & Takahashi, 2017;Smith & Joffe, 2009;Wozniak, Wessler, & Lück, 2017).…”
Section: Climate Change Visualsmentioning
confidence: 99%