“…Generally, palaeoecological reconstructions for Neolithic archaeological investigations are focused mostly on determining the character of local vegetation and its changes during the human occupation (e.g., Berglund & Ralska‐Jasiewiczowa, 1986), as well as on presenting indicators of palaeoenvironments (e.g., Nevalainen et al, 2011; Ruiz et al, 2006), including trophic status (e.g., Brooks et al, 2001; Kittel et al, 2014, 2018b; Luoto, 2011; Pawłowski et al, 2016a; Płóciennik et al, 2015). The first palaeoecological reconstructions in the Serteya microregion were conducted in the 2000s (e.g., Dolukhanov et al, 2004; Kul'kova et al, 2001; Mazurkevich et al, 2009; Mazurkevich, 2003; Tarasov et al, 2019) and were mostly focused on vegetation development and lake water level fluctuations studies based on pollen, diatom and geochemical analyses. However, those studies did not address the anthropogenic aspects of the landscape evolution and resource availability, based on plant macrofossils and palaeozoological proxies, or provided a detailed palaeoecological reconstruction for the time period of the occupation.…”