2008
DOI: 10.1175/2007jcli1946.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate Signal Detection Times and Constraints on Climate Benchmark Accuracy Requirements

Abstract: Long-term trends in the climate system are always partly obscured by naturally occurring interannual variability. All else being equal, the larger the natural variability, the less precisely one can estimate a trend in a time series of data. Measurement uncertainty, though, also obscures long-term trends. The way in which measurement uncertainty and natural interannual variability interact in inhibiting the detection of climate trends using simple linear regression is derived and the manner in which the intera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 for all inspected RO variables. For different timescales the given (random) uncertainties scale as σ ( t/ t target ) 3/2 , where t is 7 yr and t target is the target time (Leroy et al, 2008) (e.g. σ = 3 m per 7 yr translates to an error of 2.5 m per 10 yr for a 10-yr time series).…”
Section: Mean Trends and Structural Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 for all inspected RO variables. For different timescales the given (random) uncertainties scale as σ ( t/ t target ) 3/2 , where t is 7 yr and t target is the target time (Leroy et al, 2008) (e.g. σ = 3 m per 7 yr translates to an error of 2.5 m per 10 yr for a 10-yr time series).…”
Section: Mean Trends and Structural Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…instrument drift, sampling, seasonal variation, etc., in order to detect a trend in a climate parameter above a background of natural variability in a given time frame. Of course, there are fundamental limits to the accuracy of measuring climate trends, which can be set with reference to the perfect climate observing system following the methodology of Leroy et al [35]. Figure 4 presents the results of such an analysis for the CRF example using the proposed operational characteristics of TRUTHS and CLARREO.…”
Section: (Iii) Optimizing Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…detection time). As stated by Leroy et al (2008), it is obvious that the longer the time series, the easier it should be to distinguish a trend from natural variability (and measurement uncertainty), because shorter periods of record generally have small signal-to-noise (S / N) ratios (Allen et al, 1994). The strong timescale dependence of S / N ratios arises primarily because of the large decrease in noise amplitude as the period used for trend fitting increases (Santer et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong timescale dependence of S / N ratios arises primarily because of the large decrease in noise amplitude as the period used for trend fitting increases (Santer et al, 2011). Based on a hypothetical data set with certain statistical characteristics, Leroy et al (2008) determined the minimum detection time as about 33 yr for detecting a global warming signal of 0.2 K decade −1 . Similarly, assessing the trend consistency over a range of timescales (from 10 to 32 yr), Santer et al (2011) states that multi-decadal records are required for identifying the human effect on the climate variables (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%