2017
DOI: 10.21425/f59233610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate seasonality, fire and global patterns of tree cover

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The histograms in (c) show multimodal patterns of both observed and simulated tree cover, which indicate alternative stable states. The low density of tree cover values just below 10% in the simulated results is explained by the absence of effect of fire below this value (see Figure 1c) et al, 2011; e.g., Bucini et al, 2017; but see Wuyts, Champneys, & House, 2017), which hampers the inference of temporal dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The histograms in (c) show multimodal patterns of both observed and simulated tree cover, which indicate alternative stable states. The low density of tree cover values just below 10% in the simulated results is explained by the absence of effect of fire below this value (see Figure 1c) et al, 2011; e.g., Bucini et al, 2017; but see Wuyts, Champneys, & House, 2017), which hampers the inference of temporal dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We found an important effect of rainfall variability on fire‐driven alternative stable states. It is known that in wet areas on the one hand, occasional dry periods enhance fire‐prone conditions; in dry areas on the other hand, occasional wet periods stimulate fuel build‐up for fires in dry periods (Archibald, Nickless, Govender, Scholes, & Lehsten, ; Archibald, Roy, van Wilgen, & Scholes, ; Bucini, Beckage, & Gross, ; Van der Werf, Randerson, Giglio, Gobron, & Dolman, ). However, we found that seasonal and interannual rainfall variability affect fire regimes in different ways with contrasting implications for forest‐savanna stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, achieving a better understanding of the effects of PV on tree cover is highly relevant in the context of on‐going climate change. Existing analyses of the effects of PV have mostly focused on PV at seasonal time‐scales using simplistic climatic indices derived from monthly rainfall data (Bucini, Beckage, & Gross, ; Holmgren, Hirota, van Nes, & Scheffer, ; Lehmann et al, ; Staal, Dekker, Xu, & van Nes, ; Staver et al, ; Zemp et al, ; Zeng, Chen, Piao, Rabin, & Shen, ) while relatively few studies have investigated the importance of PV at daily (Good & Caylor, ; Kulmatiski & Beard, ) or inter‐annual (Holmgren et al, ) time‐scales. Moreover, the collinearity and interaction between PV components, MAP and other environmental drivers were not well characterized in previous analyses, which can bias the reported effects and contribution of PV to spatial variations in tree cover.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that the effect of rainfall variability on fire occurrence, however, varies along the rainfall gradient. It is known that in wet areas on the one hand, occasional dry periods enhance fire-prone conditions; in dry areas on the other hand, occasional wet periods stimulate fuel build-up for fires in dry periods (Van der Werf et al, 2008;Archibald et al, 2009;Archibald et al, 2010;Bucini et al, 2017). However, seasonal and inter-annual rainfall variability affect fire regimes in different ways with contrasting implications for forest-savanna stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model occupies a promising niche that could stimulate new insights in tropical fire-vegetation dynamics because it bridges a gap between observations and theory. On the observational side the work on tropical tree cover that indicates alternative stable states has so far been mostly based on static patterns instead of dynamic ones (Hirota et al, 2011;Staver et al, 2011b;Holmgren et al, 2013;Bucini et al, 2017; but see Wuyts et al, 2017), which hampers the inference of temporal dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%