2012
DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate Risks and Carbon Prices: Revising the Social Cost of Carbon

Abstract: The social cost of carbon -or marginal damage caused by an additional ton of carbon dioxide emissions -has been estimated by a U.S. government working group at $21/tCO 2 in 2010. That calculation, however, omits many of the biggest risks associated with climate change, and downplays the impact of current emissions on future generations. Our reanalysis explores the effects of uncertainty about climate sensitivity, the shape of the damage function, and the discount rate. We show that the social cost of carbon is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
66
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that damages are 50% of world GDP at 6 o C and 99% at 12.5 • C, Ackerman and Stanton (2012) recalibrate (5) with ζ 1 = 0.00245, ζ 2 = 2, ζ 3 = 5.021 × 10 −6 , and ζ 4 = 6.76. The extra term in the denominator is included to capture potentially catastrophic losses at high temperatures.…”
Section: The Carbon Cycle Temperature and Global Warming Damagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that damages are 50% of world GDP at 6 o C and 99% at 12.5 • C, Ackerman and Stanton (2012) recalibrate (5) with ζ 1 = 0.00245, ζ 2 = 2, ζ 3 = 5.021 × 10 −6 , and ζ 4 = 6.76. The extra term in the denominator is included to capture potentially catastrophic losses at high temperatures.…”
Section: The Carbon Cycle Temperature and Global Warming Damagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Clearly this begs the question of how much higher the SCC might be, if the damage function is steeper. A recent paper by Ackerman and Stanton (2012) attempts to answer it using the DICE model, applying a functional form proposed by Weitzman (2012). Furthermore, they also question the damage estimates of the models at low temperatures, drawing on work by Michael Hanemann (2008) that argues damages could also be significantly higher in this realm.…”
Section: The Damage Function and The Sccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the PAGE2002 model with a very low discount rate of 1.4%, Stern obtained $110/tCO 2 as the marginal cost due to increases in carbon emissions [15]. In 2010, the assessment of the US IWGSCC was $21/tCO 2 , and the predicted cost in 2020 was $26/tCO 2 [19]. In 2013, using the PAGE2009 model, Hope calculated the cost to be $106/tCO 2 under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) A1B scenario [16].…”
Section: Social Carbon Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying the PAGE and DICE models, McKinsey & Company calculated the average social carbon cost in 2050 to be $45/tCO 2 and $64/tCO 2 , respectively, but the 95% probability value would be $136/tCO 2 [19]. In studying a low-cost pathway for reducing carbon emissions of a particular commercial building and its benefits, Cox et al believed that the unit social carbon cost would rise from $25/tCO 2 in 2015 to $47/tCO 2 in 2050 (based on the 2009 price) [31].…”
Section: Social Carbon Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation