2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-019-01948-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate responses of ring widths and radial growth phenology of Betula ermanii, Fagus crenata and Quercus crispula in a cool temperate forest in central Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In KRRF, this response is consistent with that of individualbased annual tree growth (Matsushita et al manuscript in preparation), which often shows considerable inter-annual variations (Ohtsuka et al 2009) in response to climatic factors (Nabeshima et al 2010). The negative effect of warmer previous autumn on annual tree growth of deciduous broadleaved species is also found in KRRF (Matsushita et al manuscript in preparation) and in a cool-temperate forest in central Japan (Shen et al 2020). Also, over the Northern Hemisphere, autumn warming causes a larger increment in respiration than in photosynthesis and leads to net carbon loss (Piao et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In KRRF, this response is consistent with that of individualbased annual tree growth (Matsushita et al manuscript in preparation), which often shows considerable inter-annual variations (Ohtsuka et al 2009) in response to climatic factors (Nabeshima et al 2010). The negative effect of warmer previous autumn on annual tree growth of deciduous broadleaved species is also found in KRRF (Matsushita et al manuscript in preparation) and in a cool-temperate forest in central Japan (Shen et al 2020). Also, over the Northern Hemisphere, autumn warming causes a larger increment in respiration than in photosynthesis and leads to net carbon loss (Piao et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…2). Whereas responses to chronic exogenous environmental changes are the reason LSMs exist and are therefore to some extent accounted for by all current LSMs, size-dependent growth and size differentiation within a stand are, at present, only accounted for in a few LSMs, for example, CLM (ED) (Fisher et al, 2015), ORCHIDEE (Naudts et al, 2015), and LPJ-GUESS (Smith, 2001). The ORCHIDEE model (revision 5698) meets the aforementioned minimum requirements and, therefore, will be used in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, N fertilization was conducted in early August to gain an adequate amount of data in both periods, before and after N fertilization, within one growing season to focus on the short-term response of Q. crispula. Q. crispula has a growth potential for biomass in August and September when N fertilization finishes [28]. Thus, this timing is reasonable in evaluating the short-term response.…”
Section: N Fertilizationmentioning
confidence: 98%