2021
DOI: 10.1017/s1355770x21000097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate resilience in rural Zambia: evaluating farmers’ response to El Niño-induced drought

Abstract: This paper aims at identifying whether and how sustainable land management practices and livelihood diversification strategies have contributed to moderating the impacts of the El Niño-related drought in Zambia. This is done using a specifically designed survey called the El Niño Impact Assessment Survey, which is combined with the Rural Agricultural Livelihoods Surveys, as well as high resolution rainfall data at the ward level over 34 years. This unique panel data set allows us to control for the time-invari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several driving forces affect the profitability of livelihood strategies. Examples are agricultural technologies (Angelsen and Kaimowitz, 2001), levels of natural resource use (Coomes et al, 2004), historical conditions (Coomes et al, 2016), soil fertility (Heger et al, 2020) and the availability of other ecosystem services (Junqueira et al, 2016), environmental variability (Börner et al, 2015b;Ajefu et al, 2020;Alfani et al, 2021;Girard et al, 2021), farm/forest output level (i.e., productivity) (Klemick, 2011), market prices (e.g., the decline in Brazil nut retail prices) (Ubiali and Alexiades, 2022), and institutional constraints (e.g., land tenure insecurity, encroaching) (Tseng et al, 2021).…”
Section: Metric Of Forest Cover and Lucc Extend And Patchinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several driving forces affect the profitability of livelihood strategies. Examples are agricultural technologies (Angelsen and Kaimowitz, 2001), levels of natural resource use (Coomes et al, 2004), historical conditions (Coomes et al, 2016), soil fertility (Heger et al, 2020) and the availability of other ecosystem services (Junqueira et al, 2016), environmental variability (Börner et al, 2015b;Ajefu et al, 2020;Alfani et al, 2021;Girard et al, 2021), farm/forest output level (i.e., productivity) (Klemick, 2011), market prices (e.g., the decline in Brazil nut retail prices) (Ubiali and Alexiades, 2022), and institutional constraints (e.g., land tenure insecurity, encroaching) (Tseng et al, 2021).…”
Section: Metric Of Forest Cover and Lucc Extend And Patchinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, there is little evidence showing that the adoption of current sustainable land management practices occurs due to the risk of weather shocks. Similarly, Alfani et al (2021) show the limited impact of adaptation strategies to cope with the El-Nino related drought in Zambia and its impact on maize yields. Nshakira-Rukundo et al (2021) review the factors affecting the low uptake of insurance against these shocks by households.…”
Section: Climate Change Adaptation Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop and local labor diversification also constitute two well-known adaptation strategies in rural areas. However, while crop diversification is often adopted as an ex ante practice (Asfaw et al, 2018;Alfani et al, 2021;Aragón et al, 2021), labor diversification represents an ex post coping strategy used to face unexpected and severe climatic events such as droughts or floods. By and large, a negative shock in agricultural productivity is expected to drive farmers to allocate more time to economic sectors that are less climate-sensitive, generating an agricultural job displacement that may be associated with a local rural-to-urban migration (for a recent review of this phenomenon, see Cattaneo et al (2020)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%