Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe

Abstract

Climate change has already triggered species distribution shifts in many parts of the world. Increasing impacts are expected for the future, yet few studies have aimed for a general understanding of the regional basis for species vulnerability. We projected late 21st century distributions for 1,350 European plants species under seven climate change scenarios. Application of the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Red List criteria to our projections shows that many European plant species could become severely threatened. More than half of the species we studied could be vulnerable or threatened by 2080. Expected species loss and turnover per pixel proved to be highly variable across scenarios (27-42% and 45-63% respectively, averaged over Europe) and across regions (2.5-86% and 17-86%, averaged over scenarios). Modeled species loss and turnover were found to depend strongly on the degree of change in just two climate variables describing temperature and moisture conditions. Despite the coarse scale of the analysis, species from mountains could be seen to be disproportionably sensitive to climate change (Ϸ60% species loss). The boreal region was projected to lose few species, although gaining many others from immigration. The greatest changes are expected in the transition between the Mediterranean and Euro-Siberian regions. We found that risks of extinction for European plants may be large, even in moderate scenarios of climate change and despite inter-model variability.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change storylines ͉ species extinction ͉ species turnover ͉ niche-based model

Predicting the future of forests in the Mediterranean under climate change, with niche- and process-based models: CO2 matters!

“…Thomas et al, 2004;Araú jo et al, 2005a, b;Thuiller et al, 2005). This is of particular importance in the Mediterranean region, which has a high diversity of environments and harbors Europe's greatest diversity of vegetation and fauna (Cowling et al, 1996).…”

“…As such, nichebased models are used extensively and have provided researchers with an innovative tool to explore diverse questions in ecology and conservation (see Peterson, 2007). In particular, it has become common to use such models to assess potential distribution responses to future climate scenarios (e.g., Bakkenes et al, 2002;Araú jo et al, 2004;Thomas et al, 2004;Thuiller et al, 2005;Gomez-Mendoza & Arriaga, 2007;Thuiller, 2010), using sophisticated interpolation of climate data (e.g., Hijmans et al, 2005). One of the main advantages of niche-based models is their relative simplicity, making it straightforward to develop species-specific models, which make use of the large data sets available (e.g., Forest inventories, regionalized climate).…”

Fine-scale spatial patterns of the Tertiary relict Zelkova abelicea (Ulmaceae) indicate possible processes contributing to its persistence to climate changes

“…We know little regarding the ecological processes that have allowed them to persist, while a large number of model-based papers has been published on the possible extinction of plant species due to the present climate change (cf. e.g., Thuiller et al 2005;Malcolm et al 2006). A majority of these models indicate alarming consequences of climatic change for biodiversity, with some of the worst scenarios postulating extinction rates that would qualify as the sixth mass extinction in the history of earth (Stork 2010;Barnosky et al 2011;Bellard et al 2012).…”

Are Swiss birds tracking climate change?

“…The large majority of recent studies on climate change impacts have therefore focused on the estimation of the shifts in species ranges that are expected according to different climatic and land use scenarios. These studies are mainly based on species distribution modelling and are employed in order to forecast changes in the distribution of single species Araujo et al, 2006;Beaumont et al, 2007;Huntley et al, 2007;McKenney et al, 2007;Lawler et al, 2009), ecosystems (Berry et al, 2003;Thuiller et al, 2006) or biodiversity (Bakkenes et al, 2002;Thuiller et al, 2005;Dormann et al, 2008). These techniques allow forecasting changes and are therefore important tools for current conservation planning in order to mitigate the impacts of climate and land use change on biodiversity .…”