2016
DOI: 10.17645/si.v4i1.442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate Change, Mining and Traditional Indigenous Knowledge in Australia

Abstract: Australia, in common with nations globally, faces an immediate and future environmental and economic challenge as an outcome of climate change. Indigenous communities in Australia, some who live a precarious economic and social existence, are particularly vulnerable to climate change. Impacts are already being experienced through dramatic weather events such as floods and bushfires. Other, more gradual changes, such as rising sea levels in the north of Australia, will have long-term negative consequences on co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors also suggest that “indigenous people may be strong natural allies in climate change mitigation and adaptation” (Eisenstadt & West, 2016, p. 55), but that a dialogue has been lacking, limiting the potential of climate change adaptation to achieve sustainable outcomes. In Australia, Birch (2016) stressed the importance of engaging Aboriginal communities affected by mining in efforts to support climate-resilient development in an ethical and egalitarian way, based on greater recognition of traditional knowledge systems and acknowledging previous destructive impacts on their livelihoods and cultural values. The most commonly mentioned adaptation strategy for the Yolngu Aboriginal people in Arnhem Land was to establish culturally appropriate communication channels and practices that guarantee their inclusion into the management of mining and climate change impacts, recognize the Yolngu language and traditional institutions and ensure transparency and honesty in decision-making (Petheram et al , 2010).…”
Section: The Current State Of Research On Adaptation In Mining Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also suggest that “indigenous people may be strong natural allies in climate change mitigation and adaptation” (Eisenstadt & West, 2016, p. 55), but that a dialogue has been lacking, limiting the potential of climate change adaptation to achieve sustainable outcomes. In Australia, Birch (2016) stressed the importance of engaging Aboriginal communities affected by mining in efforts to support climate-resilient development in an ethical and egalitarian way, based on greater recognition of traditional knowledge systems and acknowledging previous destructive impacts on their livelihoods and cultural values. The most commonly mentioned adaptation strategy for the Yolngu Aboriginal people in Arnhem Land was to establish culturally appropriate communication channels and practices that guarantee their inclusion into the management of mining and climate change impacts, recognize the Yolngu language and traditional institutions and ensure transparency and honesty in decision-making (Petheram et al , 2010).…”
Section: The Current State Of Research On Adaptation In Mining Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research participants explained how partnerships and relationships can be important outcomes in themselves: (Birch, 2016;Walker, Porter, & Marsh, 2012). Indigenous…”
Section: Service Models For Indigenous Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the effects of power have been considered within knowledge systems and partnerships. The role of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) has been studied in the complex and historically rooted equity challenges of the United States and Australia, both of which are usually considered Global North countries (Birch, ; Chisholm Hatfield, Marino, Powys Whyte, Dello, & Mote, ). In this context, TEK has been shown to reveal echoes of colonialism and their impact on climate change adaptation today (Chisholm Hatfield et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%