2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate change may impair electricity generation and economic viability of future Amazon hydropower

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Just over a quarter of all dams (1648; 27%) are in regions that have medium to very high biodiversity risk and are projected to also have medium to extreme risk for water scarcity in 2050 (Figure 15). The countries with the greatest number of dams in areas of medium to very high levels for both risks are Turkey (233 dams), Nepal (210), India (161), Spain (110), Albania (73), Bulgaria (60), Portugal (51), Argentina (40), USA-California (39), and Pakistan (37). In addition, individual large dams with medium to high levels of both risks include High Aswan (Egypt), Akosombo (Ghana), Ataturk (Turkey), Grand Ethiopian Renaissance (Ethiopia), Hoover (USA-Nevada), Sobradinho (Brazil-Bahia), Keban (Turkey), Kapchagay (Kazakhstan), Glen Canyon (USA-Arizona), and Mingechaur (Azerbaijan) (Figure 16).…”
Section: Hydropower Dams and The Interaction Of Projected Water Scarc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Just over a quarter of all dams (1648; 27%) are in regions that have medium to very high biodiversity risk and are projected to also have medium to extreme risk for water scarcity in 2050 (Figure 15). The countries with the greatest number of dams in areas of medium to very high levels for both risks are Turkey (233 dams), Nepal (210), India (161), Spain (110), Albania (73), Bulgaria (60), Portugal (51), Argentina (40), USA-California (39), and Pakistan (37). In addition, individual large dams with medium to high levels of both risks include High Aswan (Egypt), Akosombo (Ghana), Ataturk (Turkey), Grand Ethiopian Renaissance (Ethiopia), Hoover (USA-Nevada), Sobradinho (Brazil-Bahia), Keban (Turkey), Kapchagay (Kazakhstan), Glen Canyon (USA-Arizona), and Mingechaur (Azerbaijan) (Figure 16).…”
Section: Hydropower Dams and The Interaction Of Projected Water Scarc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climate change is also projected to reduce the discharge of the rivers in the Amazon basin. Almeida et al found that this lower discharge will reduce generation at 350 projected dams by up to 30% compared to current hydrology, potentially making these dams financially less competitive relative to other sources of renewable generation such as wind and solar [73].…”
Section: Hydrological Risks and Financial And Economic Risks For Hydr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimizing variables that integrate a set of related services into bundles (7,12,36) may also be effective in advancing strategic hydropower planning and minimizing challenges associated with complex trade-offs among criteria. Further considering uncertainties in river basin planning-such as climate change, disruptions in governance, and adoption of alternative energy sources including wind and solar (42)(43)(44)(45)(46)-will be critical before embracing hydropower expansion in the Amazon, because these are likely to shape trade-offs among criteria. In addition, site-scale optimization of operations can partly mitigate some of the adverse effects of poor dam placement (47).…”
Section: Conclusion and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MGB model (Large Basins Model) is a semi-distributed, hydrologic-hydrodynamic model that has been widely used in several hydrological studies, including real-time flow forecasting (Fan et al, 2015b;Siqueira et al, 2020), hydrological reanalysis (Wongchuig et al, 2019) and assessment of climate impacts in the Amazon (Sorribas et al, 2016;Almeida et al, 2021).…”
Section: The Mgb Hydrological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where: g is the gravity acceleration [m/s 2 ]; Δt is the model timestep [s]; Δx is the flow distance [km]; h is the maximum flow depth among all unit-catchments [m] and α is a constant lower than 1, used to avoid numerical instability, with advisable values below 0.9 (Almeida et al, 2021).…”
Section: The Mgb Hydrological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%