Climate change‐integrated conservation strategies

Abstract

Aim Conservation strategies currently include little consideration of climate change. Insights about the biotic impacts of climate change from biogeography and palaeoecology, therefore, have the potential to provide significant improvements in the effectiveness of conservation planning. We suggest a collaboration involving biogeography, ecology and applied conservation. The resulting Climate Change‐integrated Conservation Strategies (CCS) apply available tools to respond to the conservation challenges posed by climate change. Location The focus of this analysis is global, with special reference to high biodiversity areas vulnerable to climate change, particularly tropical montane settings. Methods Current tools from climatology, biogeography and ecology applicable to conservation planning in response to climate change are reviewed. Conservation challenges posed by climate change are summarized. CCS elements are elaborated that use available tools to respond to these challenges. Results Five elements of CCS are described: regional modelling; expanding protected areas; management of the matrix; regional coordination; and transfer of resources. Regional modelling uses regional climate models, biotic response models and sensitivity analysis to identify climate change impacts on biodiversity at a regional scale appropriate for conservation planning. Expansion of protected areas management and systems within the planning region are based on modelling results. Management of the matrix between protected areas provides continuity for processes and species range shifts outside of parks. Regional coordination of park and off‐park efforts allows harmonization of conservation goals across provincial and national boundaries. Finally, implementation of these CCS elements in the most biodiverse regions of the world will require technical and financial transfer of resources on a global scale. Main conclusions Collaboration across disciplines is necessary to plan conservation responses to climate change adequately. Biogeography and ecology provide insights into the effects of climate change on biodiversity that have not yet been fully integrated into conservation biology and applied conservation management. CCS provide a framework in which biogeographers, ecologists and conservation managers can collaborate to address this need. These planning exercises take place on a regional level, driven by regional climate models as well as general circulation models (GCMs), to ensure that regional climate drivers such as land use change and mesoscale topography are adequately represented. Sensitivity analysis can help address the substantial uncertainty inherent in projecting future climates and biodiversity response.

Climate change threatens giant panda protection in the 21st century

“…Although some process-based models can successfully integrate dispersal and metapopulation dynamics into forecasts of species geographic ranges (Anderson et al, 2009;Fordham et al, 2013), most of the currently available models are too complex in parameterization and validation in model application (Pearson and Dawson, 2003). The bioclimatic envelope models have various limitations (such as the assumption of equilibrium, the assumption of complete sampling of species niche, and insufficient inclusion of adaptation, evolution, and dispersal), they are still used by many researchers (Hannah et al, 2002;Huntley et al, 2010;Araújo and Peterson, 2012). With a good understanding of the modelling techniques, careful choice of explanatory variables, and appropriate model validation and testing, these models can still provide important information on the potential impact of climate change on species range shifts, and help inform conservation decisions in a changing climate (Hijmans and Graham, 2006;Araújo and Peterson, 2012).…”

Climate change adaptation and sustainable regional development: a case study for the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany

“…see Spittlehouse and Stewart (2003) or Seppälä (2009) for forestry or Hannah et al (2002) or Lawler (2009) for nature conservation). Adaptive capacity is not equally distributed within societies (Adger et al 2007), and stakeholders such as companies and corporations as well as public households which are potentially impacted by climate change need to develop appropriate adaptation measures.…”

Trends in High Nature Value farmland studies: A systematic review

“…This can reflects that many people are interested mainly on diversity of few groups, principally plants and birds (Williams et al 1997). However, a multi-taxa approach would be important for effective conservation policies, for recognising areas of high natural value and for assessing and monitoring biodiversity (Hannah et al 2002).…”