2014
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1408542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate Change and Public Health in North Carolina: A Unique State Offers 
a Unique Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28,31 Evidence attests that “public health threats will not affect all individuals equally” (p. 2). 32 Strategies must be tailored to communities and enhanced in those without sufficient resources to support adequate preparation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,31 Evidence attests that “public health threats will not affect all individuals equally” (p. 2). 32 Strategies must be tailored to communities and enhanced in those without sufficient resources to support adequate preparation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the region’s water supply stress due to periodic water shortages is anticipated to increase significantly by 2050, affecting forestry, recreation, manufacturing, agriculture, power generation, and fisheries [ 3 ]. People living within geographically isolated areas in the Southeast are likely to experience the direct and indirect effects of a changing climate differently, and perhaps more dramatically, than those residing in other areas [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our objectives are primarily descriptive and aim to provide an assessment of which challenges wildlife decision makers are prioritizing, which challenges they are not, and why. The southeast United States was our case study location as biodiversity in the region is highly impacted by urban development and habitat loss (Milesi et al 2003, Zhang et al 2008, Chandler et al 2016), introduced species (Calazans et al 2017), and climate change (Devlin et al 2014, Gutierrez and LePrevost 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%