Climate Adaptation Finance in World Bank Economic Development Programs: The Challenges of Systemic Transformation via “Scaling Up”

Abstract

Worldwide only about four percent of the estimated $500 billion-plus in public and private climate finance in 2017 was destined for adaptation. However, institutions like the World Bank are positioning themselves for a transformation in adaptation finance, seeking to provide substantially more adaptation finance as distinct from financial support for greenhouse gas mitigation. This article explores the recent emergence of adaptation as a higher priority and how a longer-term time horizon is necessary if a transformation in climate change governance is to occur which places greater emphasis on sustainable development goals relating to improvement of circumstances of citizens in the most climate-vulnerable nations, mostly in the Global South. The article also considers the important debate in the climate change policy literature over the extent to which funds supporting adaptation are going to lower-income nations or people, as might be anticipated given the view that the poor are more vulnerable to the adverse impacts of climate change. Data linking World Bank project funding to climate change adaptation and mitigation, derived from a keyword-matching approach, show that from 2010 to 2018, the share of climate-change-related finance devoted to adaptation in World Bank projects increased considerably. The data indicate that adaptation funding tends to be directed more to more climate-vulnerable nations and those with greater state fragility, but not to low-income countries versus high-income countries. Implications are considered for how this change might be “scaled up” to achieve a transformational status.

Developing climate governance strategies in Nigeria: An emphasis on methane emissions mitigation

“…The World Bank, for instance, dedicates substantial financial resources and technical knowledge to aid countries in their adaptation and mitigation efforts. Through funding for infrastructure projects, capacity-building initiatives, and research, the World Bank ensures that nations, especially those most vulnerable, are equipped to address climate-induced challenges (Eisenstadt et al, 2021;Michaelowa et al, 2021).…”

The “Adaptation Paradox” and Citizen Ambiguity over Government Climate Policies: Survey Findings from Bangladesh

“…This observation suggests, as per the critique of polycentrism in [9], that successful adaptation in nations such as Bangladesh requires the availability of funding from the "next level up"-the international community. Yet, funding flows from developed nations to developing ones remain scant [12,13]). Moreover, only three percent of 1700 adaptation initiatives surveyed had reported actually reducing climate risks to date [14].…”

The fragmentation of climate change adaptation – the Sweden case

“…Despite this lack of clarity when it comes to effective adaptation practices, adaptation challenges seem to be more typical, especially when examining developed economies (Sarkodie and Strezov, 2019). The general challenges are mainly centered around financial challenges, which also include financial relationships between developed and developing countries (Bigger and Millington, 2020;Eisenstadt et al, 2021), lack of capacity and responsibility (Artur et al, 2018), absence of legislative clarity in the built environment (Kristl et al, 2020), institutional response to the adaptation challenges (Kristl et al, 2020;Valente and Veloso-Gomes, 2020) and the complexities within coastal cities (Valente and Veloso-Gomes, 2020).…”