Climate Adaptation as a Control Problem: Review and Perspectives on Dynamic Water Resources Planning Under Uncertainty

Abstract

Climate change introduces substantial uncertainty to water resources planning and raises the key question: when, or under what conditions, should adaptation occur? A number of recent studies aim to identify policies mapping future observations to actions—in other words, framing climate adaptation as an optimal control problem. This paper uses the control paradigm to review and classify recent dynamic planning studies according to their approaches to uncertainty characterization, policy structure, and solution methods. We propose a set of research gaps and opportunities in this area centered on the challenge of characterizing uncertainty, which prevents the unambiguous application of control methods to this problem. These include exogenous uncertainty in forcing, model structure, and parameters propagated through a chain of climate and hydrologic models; endogenous uncertainty in human‐environmental system dynamics across multiple scales; and sampling uncertainty due to the finite length of historical observations and future projections. Recognizing these challenges, several opportunities exist to improve the use of control methods for climate adaptation, namely, how problem context and understanding of climate processes might assist with uncertainty quantification and experimental design, out‐of‐sample validation and robustness of optimized adaptation policies, and monitoring and data assimilation, including trend detection, Bayesian inference, and indicator variable selection. We conclude with a summary of recommendations for dynamic water resources planning under climate change through the lens of optimal control.

Evaluating participatory modelling methods for co-creating pathways to sustainability

“…We began by soliciting initial ideas from the literature. For methods, we reviewed suggested techniques from multiple areas where participatory modelling is being used, including environmental modelling (10), robust decision-making (30) and the broader decision sciences (46), sustainability assessment (47), and ecosystem service assessment (13). Some of these identified methods (e.g., causal loop…”

Solver-Based Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) Based Novel Approach for Hydroelectric Power Generation Optimization

“…The electricity generation from hydroelectric power plants is greatly affected by the climate and environmental changes, due to which the supply uncertainties take place [13,14]. If these uncertainties in the supply are not taken care of, and the PSOs do not well plan the transmission and distribution systems, may result in socio-economic problems.…”

Can Exploratory Modeling of Water Scarcity Vulnerabilities and Robustness Be Scenario Neutral?

“…Appropriately selecting, sizing, and operating water infrastructure to reduce the impacts of droughts and floods is an exercise in hedging uncertainty (Herman et al., 2020). Underbuild and you risk severe socioeconomic impacts from water scarcity or flooding; overbuild and you risk stranding assets for decades.…”

“…After using scenario‐neutral analyses to determine factors to monitor, optimal control methods can be applied to optimize values of these factors that should “trigger” adaptive management decisions such as expanding reservoir capacity, building a desalination plant, or raising levee heights (Fletcher, Lickley, & Strzepek, 2019; Fletcher, Strzepek, et al., 2019; Groves et al., 2015; Kwakkel et al., 2015, 2016; Mortazavi‐Naeini et al., 2015; Trindade et al., 2017, 2019; Woodward et al., 2014; Zeff et al., 2016). Applying such optimization approaches for dynamic adaptation requires that performance across the scenarios be aggregated into an objective function (Herman et al., 2020). Consequently, a probability distribution must be specified.…”

“…Herman et al. (2020) argue that policies should therefore be optimized over multiple assumed probability distributions to test the sensitivity of the optimal solutions to these assumptions. Bartholomew and Kwakkel (2020) illustrate such a sensitivity analysis, optimizing lake management plans to be robust to deep uncertainties in the lake's phosphorus recycling and loss parameters under alternative robust optimization frameworks.…”