2023
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4470596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate Action from Abroad: Assessing Mass Support for Cross-Border Climate Compensation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From these choices, the researcher can estimate the causal effect of a change in a policy's design on the probability of public support. This conjoint methodology is a robust and externally valid technique for measuring multi-dimensional preferences (Hainmueller, Hopkins, and Yamamoto 2014), and has been used to assess preferences over the design of climate policy (Bechtel and Scheve 2013;Bergquist, Mildenberger, and Stokes 2020), cross-border climate finance transfers (Gaikwad, Genovese, and Tingley 2022a;Gampfer, Bernauer, and Kachi 2014), and job for transitioning workers (Blankenship et al 2022).…”
Section: Preference Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these choices, the researcher can estimate the causal effect of a change in a policy's design on the probability of public support. This conjoint methodology is a robust and externally valid technique for measuring multi-dimensional preferences (Hainmueller, Hopkins, and Yamamoto 2014), and has been used to assess preferences over the design of climate policy (Bechtel and Scheve 2013;Bergquist, Mildenberger, and Stokes 2020), cross-border climate finance transfers (Gaikwad, Genovese, and Tingley 2022a;Gampfer, Bernauer, and Kachi 2014), and job for transitioning workers (Blankenship et al 2022).…”
Section: Preference Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%