Clifford Algebras and Their Applications in Mathematical Physics 1986
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-4728-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clifford Algebras and Spinors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
861
1
21

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 457 publications
(887 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
861
1
21
Order By: Relevance
“…The group of operations thus defined is the P in(2N) group, the double cover of O(2N) [21,22,23]. In turn, the subgroup of P in(2N) generated by an even number of reflections is the covering group of SO(2N), Spin(2N), associated with the linear fermion canonical transformations (also known as the Bogoliubov-Valatin [25] or squeeze transformations [26]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group of operations thus defined is the P in(2N) group, the double cover of O(2N) [21,22,23]. In turn, the subgroup of P in(2N) generated by an even number of reflections is the covering group of SO(2N), Spin(2N), associated with the linear fermion canonical transformations (also known as the Bogoliubov-Valatin [25] or squeeze transformations [26]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to choose a proper framework for model building and a number system which can incorporate the complexity of Nature. In the expression of fiber bundles (E, Π ,F, G, X) [9][10][11][12], Connes defined two fibers F that are extended from a point of a base space X = S 3 , and the group G that defines dynamics of leptons described by Dirac equation is expressed by quaternions ∈ H, and a tangential space TS 3 was identified with S 3 × R 4 spacetime.…”
Section: Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Induced representations [10] are useful in describing a group G which hasa closed normal subgroup N. Irreducible representations of semi-direct product G is written in the form nh.…”
Section: Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One should note that even four-vectors cannot achieve this kind of union: the spatial vector component of four-vectors belongs to ordinary three-dimensional space and thus is not properly connected to a specific observer (with a specific proper time). On the other hand, the dyadic notation and the vector analysis in ordinary threedimensional space, introduced by Gibbs, suffer from a major flaw: the cross product of vectors, apart from not being associative, can only be defined in three or seven dimensions [11]. Spacetime algebra [12], the geometric algebra [13,14] of spacetime, is -from the authors' viewpoint -the most adequate formalism to achieve that union of space and time envisioned by Minkowski.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%