2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40948-019-00107-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cliff face rock slope stability analysis based on unmanned arial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sliding body or surface delivers necessary information and has been extensively adopted previously to evaluate the stability of all types of slopes. For example the stability of heterogeneous slopes was calculated with the help CFS to take safety measures [27], for dam slopes [29], rock slopes [30], highway slopes [31] and rock cliff face [32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sliding body or surface delivers necessary information and has been extensively adopted previously to evaluate the stability of all types of slopes. For example the stability of heterogeneous slopes was calculated with the help CFS to take safety measures [27], for dam slopes [29], rock slopes [30], highway slopes [31] and rock cliff face [32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For rock discontinuity extraction (the mathematical model is a plane), the RANSAC algorithm has two advantages: 1) it can be directly applied to raw point cloud data without triangulation gridding, and 2) it has strong robustness and can process more than 50% of the outliers. Based on these advantages, the RANSAC algorithm has been studied for the extraction of planes or discontinuities (Wang et al, 2019). However, due to the large number of points of a rock mass, most approaches are inefficient.…”
Section: Rock Mass Discontinuity Extraction Based On the Improved Random Sample Consensus Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, direct observation and monitoring with these methods remain expensive from both human and equipment resource perspectives, and the results are based on several single-point values, which may be unreliable and incomplete and, more importantly, may disturb the original soil pattern, resulting in less accurate evaluations. In addition, remote-sensing-based methods, such as Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) [21], photogrammetry using unmanned aerial vehicles [22], and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) [23], can be used to regularly monitor ground movement, but these surveys can only provide topographical information; therefore, they cannot provide real-time monitoring and early warning for structural failure. us, a reliable real-time monitoring method is required to identify changes in the internal conditions that precede failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%