Client perceptions of the mental health engagement network: a qualitative analysis of an electronic personal health record

Forchuk, Cheryl; Reiss, Jeffrey P.; O’Regan, Tony; Ethridge, Paige; Donelle, Lorie; Rudnick, Abraham

doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0614-7

Cited by 44 publications

(63 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In just five studies [23,24,26,33,36] were we able to find negative impacts of patient portals on the following clusters: patientcenteredness (6 mentions), delivery system (4 mentions), performance management (1 mention) and interpersonal teamwork (1 mention) (see Table 5). …”

Section: Sub-question D: Which Mechanisms Are Negatively Correlated Wmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to four studies [24,26,33,36], patient portals can have a negative impact on patient-centeredness in several ways. For example, one study [24] found that patients thought the portal still did not provide all the relevant health information online: "I'd like to be able to see all of my lab results."…”

Section: Cluster 1 Patient-centerednessmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Another study described how patients can be overwhelmed by all the possibilities the portal offers [33]. Overwhelming patients with information contradicts element 1.1 of patient-centeredness: to provide "[…] understandable and client-centered information.".…”

Section: Cluster 1 Patient-centerednessmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Overwhelming patients with information contradicts element 1.1 of patient-centeredness: to provide "[…] understandable and client-centered information.". However, the researchers showed that many of these fears are overcome when patients become more familiar with the technology [33].…”

Section: Cluster 1 Patient-centerednessmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

In pursuit of integrated care: the contribution of patient portals (Preprint)

Zwikker¹,

Scheepers²,

Smit³

et al. 2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Advocates of patient portals claim that they can strengthen integrated care for patients with complex or chronic health issues. However, it remains unclear how patient portals can achieve this, since indicators of integrated care are absent in most research on the matter. Objective: This study investigates the claim that patient portals can strengthen integrated care by reviewing the current research with Minkman's model of integrated care. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, PsycInfo and Embase was conducted on research literature about patient portals (and related search terms) that was published between 2006 and 2016. Parts of the selected texts were scored on items which contribute to or hinder clusters of the Minkman model, or were absent from the model. Results:The 22 selected studies we analyzed with the Minkman model implicitly address several clusters of integrated care. Most prevalent were patientcenteredness (55 mentions), delivery system (49 mentions) and performance management (33 mentions); the least prevalent were interprofessional teamwork (3 mentions) and commitment (2 mentions). Five studies showed ways in which portals can hinder integrated care (12 mentions), while four studies showed ways in which they can promote integrated care that is not yet present in Minkman's model. Conclusions: Since the majority of the studies described items that contribute towards clusters of the Minkman model, the claim that patient portals can strengthen integrated care appears to have some merit. Items with negative impact are few and are primarily related to the implementation of portals for users. Based on our findings, we advocate using all the clusters of the Minkman model, since it can help patient portals be designed and implemented more effectively.

show abstract

Section: Sub-question D: Which Mechanisms Are Negatively Correlated Wmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Cluster 1 Patient-centerednessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Cluster 1 Patient-centerednessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Cluster 1 Patient-centerednessmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

In pursuit of integrated care: the contribution of patient portals (Preprint)

Zwikker¹,

Scheepers²,

Smit³

et al. 2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Qualitative accounts of mHealth apps in the care for people with schizophrenia are sparse [27][28][29][30]. Such accounts may help to provide a specific and contextual understanding of how an mHealth app works in a real life setting, rather than just quantitatively confirm or disconfirm an expected outcome of its use.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Healthcare in the pocket: A qualitative analysis of patients� perspectives of an mHealth application to foster power in everyday living with schizophrenia (Preprint)

Terp¹,

Jørgensen²,

Laursen³

et al. 2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND We co-designed a mobile health application (mHealth app) – MindFrame - in partnership with individuals with schizophrenia and healthcare providers. The purpose of MindFrame is to empower patients to confidently manage everyday living when having been recently diagnosed with schizophrenia trough tracking of the mental health state, customized psychoeducation, medication adherence support, illness exacerbation alerts and delivery of time sensitive strategies for relapse prevention and self-management. OBJECTIVE This paper explores how young adults recently diagnosed with schizophrenia, used and perceived MindFrame as a tool to foster power in the daily management of their illness. METHODS From January to December 2016 patients from a first episode psychosis outpatient program in Denmark were invited to use MindFrame as part of their care. Along with MindFrame, they continued their usual care. They customized and used MindFrame based on their needs and preferences while assessing their mental health state on a daily basis. 27 patients used MindFrame and 13 subsequently evaluated it. The evaluation was qualitative and conducted using telephone interviews. Data were analysed using a hermeneutical approach. RESULTS The analysis showed that, for patients, MindFrame served to foster power in the everyday management of living with schizophrenia. When the app was used consistently for more than a month, and with the healthcare providers, it could provide the patients with the power to keep up their medication, to keep a step ahead of their illness and to get fast and timely help. This empowered them to stay on track with the illness, thus in control of it. Also, MindFrame could fuel the fear of restraint and illness exacerbation, thereby disempowering some from feeling certain and secure. CONCLUSIONS The findings demonstrate that MindFrame has the ability to empower young adults to manage their illness in the context of their daily lives. This contributes toward the potential of putting healthcare into the patient’s pocket. The disempowering aspect of MindFrame accentuates a need for further research to clarify the limitations of mHealth apps for patient empowerment in young adults with schizophrenia.

show abstract

Implementation of e‐mental health for depression and anxiety: A critical scoping review

Ellis

Augustsson

Grødahl

et al. 2020

Journal Community Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this review was to scope the growth and development of implementation research of e‐mental healthcare programs for anxiety and depression, the research and evaluation tools used, and the specific implementation processes and outcomes examined. A search of four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) was conducted from January 2000 to January 2019. Of 33 studies identified, most (n = 28) were published in the last five years. Only 10 used an implementation framework to guide implementation or evaluation. Most studies reported on acceptability (n = 28), appropriateness (n = 23), and feasibility (n = 17). Less commonly reported implementation outcomes were fidelity (n = 10) and adoption (n = 7); with penetration (n = 4), sustainability (n = 3), and implementation cost (n = 2) being studied rarely. Of the 21 studies that used surveys to study implementation outcomes, less than half used a previously published survey (n = 9). More rigorous implementation studies, underpinned by strong theory and real‐world understanding, are urgently needed.

show abstract

Client perceptions of the mental health engagement network: a qualitative analysis of an electronic personal health record

Cited by 44 publications

References 29 publications

In pursuit of integrated care: the contribution of patient portals (Preprint)

In pursuit of integrated care: the contribution of patient portals (Preprint)

Healthcare in the pocket: A qualitative analysis of patients� perspectives of an mHealth application to foster power in everyday living with schizophrenia (Preprint)

Implementation of e‐mental health for depression and anxiety: A critical scoping review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About