Client-Identified needs and agency-provided services at a harm reduction community based organization in the District of Columbia

Abstract

BackgroundHarm reduction case management relies on client-identified goals to drive the provision of care in order to “meet clients where they are at”. This research measured the level of agreement between client-identified needs and agency-provided services at a community based organization (CBO) in Washington DC by examining: (1) the services clients most often identified, (2) the services most often given to clients by the CBO, and (3) the level of alignment between client-identified needs and services provided.MethodsCase file reviews were completed for 151 clients who received case management services at the CBO between January 2010 and February 2011. Client-identified needs and agency-provided services were extracted from case files and divided into 9 matching need and service categories: pharmaceutical assistance (e.g., prescription renewal), medical or dental care, housing, mental health services, substance use services, support services (e.g., support group meetings), legal assistance, and employment/job training. Client-identified needs and services provided were analyzed using McNemar’s Chi-square to assess for significant differences in discordant pairs.ResultsClients were mostly Black (90.7 %), heterosexual (63.6 %), HIV positive (93.4 %), and over 40 years old at the time of intake (76.2 %). On average, clients identified 2.44 needs and received 3.29 services. The most common client-identified needs were housing (63.7 %), support services (34.3 %), and medical/dental care (29.5 %). The most common agency-provided services were housing (58.2 %), support services (51.4 %), and medical/dental care (45.2 %). In 6 of the 9 service categories, there were statistically significant (p < .01) differences between those who received services not asked for and those who did not receive asked for services in the categories of pharmaceutical assistance, medical/dental care, substance abuse services, support services, legal assistance, and food access. In each of these matched service categories, the percentage of clients who received services not asked for was significantly higher than those who did not.ConclusionThis research shows that, while there is general alignment between the services that clients most often want and the services most often provided, there are still instances where services are requested but are not being provided.

Intersecting substance use treatment and harm reduction services: exploring the characteristics and service needs of a community-based sample of people who use drugs

“…This includes offering a continuum of co-located treatment, harm reduction, and social services that can meet individuals where they are. This would help facilitate access to life-saving services and greater socioeconomic stability [ 28 , 29 ]. This may be particularly important for individuals with multiple vulnerabilities, as well as during emergencies—such as the COVID-19 pandemic—when minimizing travel and co-locating access to multiple health and social services is key [ 30 ].…”

Updated Understanding of the Experiences and Perceptions of Alcohol Use in Later Life

“…Thus, it is critical to regularly update what is known about older adults' experiences with and perceptions of alcohol. Indeed, for health promotion efforts and interventions to be effective in reducing older adults' alcohol-related harms, practitioners need to meet their patients and clients "where they are at" (O'Rourke, Ruiz, & Allen, 2015). Workshop dialogues offered a unique method for accessing this information in a comfortable and non-judgmental way (Canham, Humphries, Kupferschmidt, & Lonsdale, 2019).…”

Intersecting substance use treatment and harm reduction services: Exploring the characteristics and service-needs of a community-based sample of people who use drugs

“…This would help facilitate access to life-saving services and greater socioeconomic stability. (28,29) This may be particularly important for individuals with multiple vulnerabilities, as well as during emergencies -such as the COVID-19 pandemic -when minimizing travel and co-locating access to multiple health and social services is key. (30) In our study, programs that included both MOUD + SSP offered the greatest range of treatment and harm reduction services, including naloxone distribution, overdose prevention education, sameday treatment initiation, drop-in spaces, peer services/street outreach, and counseling services.…”