Abstract:Despite the ongoing debate about intervention best practices for intimate partner violence (IPV), few researchers have elicited the perspectives of clients themselves about what interventions most effectively decrease violence and increase safety. Using qualitative narrative analysis methodology, the researchers conducted 48 client participant interviews and 5 staff interviews to better understand couples' perspectives of a multicouple conjoint treatment program for IPV. Several recurring themes included (a) g… Show more
“…Referring to the issue of parenthood, in line with the guidelines of other IPV‐specific couple treatment modalities (Cooper and Vetere, ; Todahl et al ., ), the present findings also highlight parenthood as an important theme in IPV couple therapy conversations (Hakala, Jalava and Holma, ; Juntunen and Holma, ). It is essential that therapists take into account the views of children affected by the violence between their parents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It is important to view dyadic interactions as an effort to understand both members of the couple, not as a systemic causality of violence thus allowing victim blaming. Despite promising results, little is yet known about how to promote successful outcome in couple therapy for IPV (Stith and McCollum, ; Todahl et al ., ). What seems clear from a recent review is that couple therapy has a positive impact in decreasing violence recidivism, and that couple therapy is a slightly better treatment approach than standard treatments when working with violent couples (Karakurt, Whiting, Esch, Bolen and Calabrese, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Todahl et al . () noted that participants reported improvement in their parenting skills in multicouple group treatment for IPV. These complexities and concerns reflect the high amount of uncertainty experienced by IPV therapists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lechtenberg and colleagues () showed that the therapists’ emphasis on emotional safety was highly valued by both male and female participants. In the same vein, Todahl and colleagues () reported that clients felt safe, pointing out, however, that feeling safe is conditional on screening, voluntary participation, and the format of the programme. In sum, clients seem to value screening and an emphasis on safety when participating in couple treatment for IPV.…”
Despite controversy over the indications of couple therapy for IPV, current research has indicated some benefits. This article examines some crucial aspects when dealing with couple therapy for IPV, such as how dominance and power abuse are present, and which important issues should be taken into account during the therapeutic process and be brought up in therapeutic conversations. It also proposes strategies for therapists conducting couple therapy for IPV. Ten studies conducted within the Jyv€ askyl€ a research project on couple therapy for IPV were reviewed. Findings highlighted the importance of the therapists' awareness of the presence of violence, dominance and power during the sessions, and of how cultural issues could prevent their recognition. Responsibility and couple agreement on the violent behaviour seemed especially relevant at the beginning of the treatment. Potentially useful therapeutic strategies are directedness, use of reflective dialogue, and continuous assessment.
Practitioner points• In couple treatment for IPV therapists should (a) actively bring up violence, responsibility and parenting, and (b) reflect on the culturally dominant understandings of IPV • To regulate the presence of dominance, therapists' directivity might promote equal distribution of talk, and increase the therapeutic alliance • Therapist strategies such as multivoiced addresses, reflective dialogue and a directive approach may promote clients' responsibility and reflexivity
“…Referring to the issue of parenthood, in line with the guidelines of other IPV‐specific couple treatment modalities (Cooper and Vetere, ; Todahl et al ., ), the present findings also highlight parenthood as an important theme in IPV couple therapy conversations (Hakala, Jalava and Holma, ; Juntunen and Holma, ). It is essential that therapists take into account the views of children affected by the violence between their parents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It is important to view dyadic interactions as an effort to understand both members of the couple, not as a systemic causality of violence thus allowing victim blaming. Despite promising results, little is yet known about how to promote successful outcome in couple therapy for IPV (Stith and McCollum, ; Todahl et al ., ). What seems clear from a recent review is that couple therapy has a positive impact in decreasing violence recidivism, and that couple therapy is a slightly better treatment approach than standard treatments when working with violent couples (Karakurt, Whiting, Esch, Bolen and Calabrese, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Todahl et al . () noted that participants reported improvement in their parenting skills in multicouple group treatment for IPV. These complexities and concerns reflect the high amount of uncertainty experienced by IPV therapists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lechtenberg and colleagues () showed that the therapists’ emphasis on emotional safety was highly valued by both male and female participants. In the same vein, Todahl and colleagues () reported that clients felt safe, pointing out, however, that feeling safe is conditional on screening, voluntary participation, and the format of the programme. In sum, clients seem to value screening and an emphasis on safety when participating in couple treatment for IPV.…”
Despite controversy over the indications of couple therapy for IPV, current research has indicated some benefits. This article examines some crucial aspects when dealing with couple therapy for IPV, such as how dominance and power abuse are present, and which important issues should be taken into account during the therapeutic process and be brought up in therapeutic conversations. It also proposes strategies for therapists conducting couple therapy for IPV. Ten studies conducted within the Jyv€ askyl€ a research project on couple therapy for IPV were reviewed. Findings highlighted the importance of the therapists' awareness of the presence of violence, dominance and power during the sessions, and of how cultural issues could prevent their recognition. Responsibility and couple agreement on the violent behaviour seemed especially relevant at the beginning of the treatment. Potentially useful therapeutic strategies are directedness, use of reflective dialogue, and continuous assessment.
Practitioner points• In couple treatment for IPV therapists should (a) actively bring up violence, responsibility and parenting, and (b) reflect on the culturally dominant understandings of IPV • To regulate the presence of dominance, therapists' directivity might promote equal distribution of talk, and increase the therapeutic alliance • Therapist strategies such as multivoiced addresses, reflective dialogue and a directive approach may promote clients' responsibility and reflexivity
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.