1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-0633(96)00061-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clementine imagery: selenographic coverage for cartographic and scientific use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 8 we compare the separate azimuth and incidence criteria of Cook et al (1996) and Kirk (1999a) to the bound STD < 0.6 (Becker et al, 2015) and the looser bound STD < 4 for increasing incidence suggested by Fig. 7.…”
Section: Effect Of Mismatched Illuminationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure 8 we compare the separate azimuth and incidence criteria of Cook et al (1996) and Kirk (1999a) to the bound STD < 0.6 (Becker et al, 2015) and the looser bound STD < 4 for increasing incidence suggested by Fig. 7.…”
Section: Effect Of Mismatched Illuminationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some of these consist of separate bounds on azimuth and incidence differences. For example, Cook et al (1996) imposed an upper limit of 45° sun azimuth difference when selecting candidate stereopairs from the Clementine mission to the Moon. Kirk et al (1999a) pointed out that illumination differences would have less effect at lower incidence angles and relaxed this limit for pairs with i < 60° and further for i < 30°.…”
Section: Effect Of Mismatched Illuminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel since 2007, the MRO CTX instrument captures repeat pass single panchromatic grey-scale images at~6m/pixel over a swath-width of 30km with a large number with suitable stereo angles (Cook et al, 1996).…”
Section: Dataset Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would then only identify around one third of all possible stereo-pairs but ensure that stereo-pairs which might contain small pieces of images (i.e. slivers) which might overlap were eliminated (Cook et al, 1996).…”
Section: Defining Non-repeat Stereo Pairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation