1984
DOI: 10.1063/1.526057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clebsch–Gordan coefficients for E6 and SO(10) unification models

Abstract: We illustrate here a new method for computing Clebsch–Gordan coefficients (CGC) for E6 by computing CGC for the product 27⊗27 of the irreducible representation (100000) of E6 with itself. These CGC are calculated thrice: once in a weight vector basis independent of any semisimple subgroup, then in a basis which refers to SO(10)⊆E6, and finally in a basis referring to SU(5)⊆SO(10)⊆E6.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the fact that it has received consideration for over twenty years [1], E 6 model building has not been extensively developed due to mathematical complexities associated with a rank 6 exceptional Lie group. The Clebsch-Gordan coefficients (CGCs), for instance, have only been known for the products of two fundamental irreducible representations (irreps) of the lowest dimensionality: 27 or 27 [2,3]. To our knowledge, the CGCs for higher dimensional irreps of E 6 have never been computed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the fact that it has received consideration for over twenty years [1], E 6 model building has not been extensively developed due to mathematical complexities associated with a rank 6 exceptional Lie group. The Clebsch-Gordan coefficients (CGCs), for instance, have only been known for the products of two fundamental irreducible representations (irreps) of the lowest dimensionality: 27 or 27 [2,3]. To our knowledge, the CGCs for higher dimensional irreps of E 6 have never been computed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in [2], it is sufficient to present the tensor decomposition of the dominant weight states in the product. The CGCs of the other states can be obtained with the help of the charged conjugate operators introduced in [9] (or by direct lowerings).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…|11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |100000 |100000 1 |100000 |100000 2 |100000 |100000 3 |100000 |100000 4 1 |100000 |100000 6 |110000 |110000 1 1 |110000 |110000 2 |110000 |110000 3 |110000 |110000 4 1 1 |110000 |110000 6 |011000 |011000 1 1 |011000 |011000 2 |011000 |011000 3 |011000 |011000 4 1 1 |011000 |011000 6…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The product 27 ⊗ 27 = 351 ′ ⊕ 351 ⊕ 27 is conjugated to the product studied in ref. [4]. We refer to this work to claim that all degenerate weight subspaces in the 351 ′ (or 351) are of the same dimensionality and that the degenerate weights follow the weight system of the 27.…”
Section: Mathematical Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation