2013
DOI: 10.1039/c2nj40624a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cleaving bonds in CH3OSO2CF3with [1,2,4-(Me3C)3C5H2]2CeH; an experimental and computational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, [53]. The room temperature C-N bond cleavage of anionic guanidinate ligands in rare-earth metal complexes has been reported.…”
Section: Cp 2 Lnx Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Similarly, [53]. The room temperature C-N bond cleavage of anionic guanidinate ligands in rare-earth metal complexes has been reported.…”
Section: Cp 2 Lnx Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This reaction is, in fact, very reminiscent to that of [( Ar, t Bu N) 3 Ti(O)] − with CO 2 reported by Cummins and co‐workers 6. The only known metal sulfite complex in f‐element chemistry is [{(1,2,4‐(Me 3 C) 3 C 5 H 2 ) 2 Ce}(μ‐SO 3 )], which is isolated from a mixture of multiple products, all resulting from reaction of a cerium hydride precursor with CH 3 OSO 2 CF 3 7…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All bond lengths, together with the cone angles (310.4/309.1°), fall within the range found for other bridging sulfite complexes described in the literature 4b. 7…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this binding mode is known for group 4 complexes (Giannini et al, 1997;Donkervoort et al, 1997;Basuli, Bailey et al, 2003;Basuli et al, 2004). Metallocene compounds such as the lanthanide compounds [C 5 H 3 (Hitchcock et al, 2006) and [C 5 H 2 (t-Bu) 3 ] 2 Ce( 2 O,O-OTf) (Werkema et al, 2013) have been reported as well. Compared to the above mentioned titanocene trifluoromethanesulfonate, which shows the trifluoromethanesulfonate ligand in 1 coordination, the Ti-O bonds are significantly longer in the title compound 1, pointing towards a much weaker coordination of the ligand in a symmetrical arrangement [for comparison: A: 2.078 (1), B: 2.058 (2) Å ].…”
Section: Structural Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%