1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)99941-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cleavage of members of the synaptobrevin/VAMP family by types D and F botulinal neurotoxins and tetanus toxin.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were found using BoNT C that cleaves syntaxin, or BoNT A that cleaves SNAP-25 (Figure 1). In agreement with previously published data on release from synaptosomes, BoNT C and BoNT F were both more effective at inhibiting vesicle exocytosis than was BoNT A (McMahon et al, 1992;Yamasaki et al, 1994). Other NO donors, including S-nitrosocysteine (S-NC) and acidified sodium nitrite (SN), produced similar effects (data not shown).…”
Section: Effects Of Bonts On No-stimulated Vesicle Releasesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were found using BoNT C that cleaves syntaxin, or BoNT A that cleaves SNAP-25 (Figure 1). In agreement with previously published data on release from synaptosomes, BoNT C and BoNT F were both more effective at inhibiting vesicle exocytosis than was BoNT A (McMahon et al, 1992;Yamasaki et al, 1994). Other NO donors, including S-nitrosocysteine (S-NC) and acidified sodium nitrite (SN), produced similar effects (data not shown).…”
Section: Effects Of Bonts On No-stimulated Vesicle Releasesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…BoNTs require a long incubation (90 min at tentiate VAMP binding to syntaxin 1a/GST without the 37ЊC) with synaptosomes, to be bound, internalized, and presence of SNAP-25, although this association has a for the enzymatically active light chain to gain access low affinity (Calakos et al, 1994;Pevsner et al, 1994b). to the cytosol (McMahon et al, 1992;Blasi et al, 1993a; It may be that NO is only capable of affecting binding Yamasaki et al, 1994). FM1-43 preloaded into synaptoin the conformation of this heterotrimer.…”
Section: No Potentiates Snap-25 and Vamp2 Binding To Syntaxin 1amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the similarity between TeNTand BoNT/B, these results also suggest the possibility that the two copies of the SNARE motif of VAMP are paired in such a way that they adopt the same spatial orientation with respect to the Gln76^Phe77 bond (Pellizzari et al 1996). In addition, a basic region located after the cleavage site of TeNT and BoNT/B is important for their binding and optimal cleavage of VAMP (Shone et al 1993;Yamasaki et al 1994a;Cornille et al 1995Cornille et al , 1997; (v) the SNARE motif is also important for binding and proteolysis of SNAP-25 by BoNT/A and /E. The analysis of the rate of proteolysis of several SNAP-25 fragments deleted of SNARE motif(s) shows that the latter are hydrolysed, provided however that at least one the four copies of the motif is retained.…”
Section: Zinc-endopeptidase Activitymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…These antibodies crossreact among the three SNAREs and inhibit the proteolytic activity of the neurotoxins (Pellizzari et al 1996); (iii) the various neurotoxins cross-inhibit each other (Pellizzari et al 1996); (iv) proteolysis performed on sitedirected mutated VAMP or VAMP fragments indicates that the three carboxylate residues of the V2 copy of the motif are very important for the recognition by BoNT/B and /G, whereas those of the V1 copy are implicated in the recognition of BoNT/F and TeNT (Shone & Roberts 1994;Pellizzari et al 1996;Wictome et al 1996;Pellizzari et al 1997). BoNT/D shows a particular requirement for the Met46 present in V1 (Yamasaki et al 1994a;Pellizzari et al 1997). In view of the fact that V1 is more aminoterminal with respect to V2, these results explain why the minimal length of VAMP segments cleaved by TeNT is longer than that required by BoNT/B (Shone et al 1993;Foran et al 1994).…”
Section: Zinc-endopeptidase Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next examined the involvement of R-SNAREs in Cbln1 exocytosis by microRNA-based knockdown approaches. Since VAMP1, VAMP2, and VAMP3 are cleaved by TeNT (Yamasaki et al, 1994) and VAMP5 was not expressed in the cerebellum (Figure S3A), we focused on VAMP4, VAMP7, VAMP8, Sec22b, and Ykt6. Although VAMP7 represents TeNT-insensitive VAMPs, knocking down VAMP7 did not affect Cbln1 release even in the presence of TeNT to rule out compensatory pathways (Figure 4C).…”
Section: Activity-dependent Exocytosis Of Cbln1 Is Mediated By Distinct Snaresmentioning
confidence: 99%