“…Such studies have examined how typefaces impact word recognition in visually impaired children (Bessemans 2012), and how a typeface’s intrinsic design factors mediate the perception of type (Wang and Chen 2003; Vinot and Athenes 2012). Studies focusing on the issues surrounding screen reading, as it differs from reading on paper, have typically considered typeface as a secondary factor (Gould, Alfaro, Barnes, et al 1987; Gould, Alfaro, Finn, et al 1987; Sheedy et al 2005, 2008; Slattery and Rayner 2009), often in combination with examinations of font smoothing (anti-aliasing) algorithms (Gugerty et al 2004; Sheedy et al 2005, 2008). These studies often examine typefaces with obvious stylistic differences, such as between serif and sans-serif type or blackletter families (Rayner et al 2006; Moret-Tatay and Perea 2011; Perea, Moret-Tatay, and Gómez 2011; Sanocki and Dyson 2011), but comparisons of typefaces within the same stylistic family are relatively rare (though Gould et al’s early work does examine this, albeit as a secondary focus, as previously noted).…”