2001
DOI: 10.1086/318053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clear Evidence of Reconnection Inflow of a Solar Flare

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

32
218
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 317 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
32
218
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Reconnection inflow with an apparent speed of 5 km s −1 and a plasmoid ejection could be detected during a flare by SXT and EIT (Yokoyama et al 2001).…”
Section: Flaresmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Reconnection inflow with an apparent speed of 5 km s −1 and a plasmoid ejection could be detected during a flare by SXT and EIT (Yokoyama et al 2001).…”
Section: Flaresmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the reconnection rate in the solar atmosphere has rarely been addressed, because of the difficulty in determining inflow and outflow speeds from remote-sensing observation. Nevertheless, the presence of reconnection inflow in the solar atmosphere was inferred from the two approaching legs of a cusp-shaped structure by some authors (Yokoyama et al 2001;Lin et al 2005). However, approaching legs may be caused by the relaxation of the reconnected closed loop rather than a reconnection inflow, if the observation slit is not placed exactly across the x-point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, some of the clearest evidence for this process is in the occurence and subsequent dynamics of a solar flare (e.g. Yokoyama et al 2001). The evolution/expansion of bright flare loops following an eruption are an indication of magnetic reconnection continuing in the corona (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flare loop arcades have been studied extensively from either theoretical (Sturrock 1968;Kopp & Pneuman 1976;Yokoyama & Shibata 1998) or observational (McKenzie & Hudson 1999;Yokoyama et al 2001;Isobe et al 2002) perspectives or both (Forbes & Acton 1996). There are various models for the magnetic reconnection process itself which differ in their estimation of the reconnection rate in two spatial dimensions (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%