2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.10.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma with a syncytial-type multinucleated giant tumor cell component: implications for differential diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Emperipolesis also appeared to be more prominent in cases with well‐developed and more extensive ‘squamoid’ cells. Although emperipolesis was found in all cases, this is not a specific phenomenon restricted only to these types of tumour, but has been also documented in some high‐grade clear cell RCCs with syncytial‐type multinucleated cells …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emperipolesis also appeared to be more prominent in cases with well‐developed and more extensive ‘squamoid’ cells. Although emperipolesis was found in all cases, this is not a specific phenomenon restricted only to these types of tumour, but has been also documented in some high‐grade clear cell RCCs with syncytial‐type multinucleated cells …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Williamson et al . reported 13 cases with syncytial cells and emperipolesis, and Rotterova et al . contributed a series of 14 identical tumours .…”
Section: Clear Cell Rcc With Giant Cells and Emperipolesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of these cells in CCRCC statistically correlated with higher grade and stage [14]. Syncytial cells have been associated with tumour aggressiveness in CCRCC in a very recent study [25], and rhabdoid elements are equivalent to sarcomatoid dedifferentiation in another [26]. Considering the prognostic importance of these histological findings, current sampling protocols in renal carcinomas might not be appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%