2018
DOI: 10.5194/amt-2018-134
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cleaning up our water: reducing interferences from non-homogeneous freezing of pure water in droplet freezing assays of ice nucleating particles

Abstract: Abstract. Droplet freezing techniques (DFTs) have been used for half a century to measure the concentration of ice nucleating particles (INP) in the atmosphere and determine their freezing properties to understand the effects of INPs on mixed phase clouds. The ice nucleation community has recently adopted droplet freezing assays as a commonplace experimental approach. These droplet freezing experiments are often plagued by contamination that causes non-homogeneous freezing of the pure water used to generate th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are displayed in Figure A2. The droplets started to freeze at around −20 • C, and all droplets froze at approximately −30 • C. This temperature range is higher than those detected by other cold-stage based instruments [35,36]. Such discrepancy might be caused by the different substrate materials or water impurities.…”
Section: Distilled Water Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are displayed in Figure A2. The droplets started to freeze at around −20 • C, and all droplets froze at approximately −30 • C. This temperature range is higher than those detected by other cold-stage based instruments [35,36]. Such discrepancy might be caused by the different substrate materials or water impurities.…”
Section: Distilled Water Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The volume of droplets could affect the frozen temperature of pure water as well. Polen et al [36] summarized the freezing of water in different conditions (i.e., supporting substrates, water sources, droplet sizes, etc.). Stopelli, et al [18] reported the median freezing temperature of water at −15 • C with a droplet volume of 400 µL.…”
Section: Distilled Water Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discuss INP concentrations in the context 35 of the overall dataset and for comparison with other published datasets. Although different arguments on omitting the first two wells exist Polen et al, 2018), we argue that trimming enhances representativeness, reproducibility and confidence in the INP concentrations. Thus, due to contamination potentially observed in the freezing of the first couple of wells at higher temperatures, the first two wells to freeze were omitted for calculating INP concentrations.…”
Section: Immersion Freezing Experiments and Data Analysis With Drinczmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This visualization allows for the clear comparison of many samples side by side for every sample measured in this study and using all 96 data points without trimming ( Figure S2). Polen et al (2018) similarly uses boxplots to show results of several measurements for instrument development purposes and we are extending this approach to our field collected data. 10…”
Section: Immersion Freezing Experiments and Data Analysis With Drinczmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where is the dilution factor of the initial sample. However, in some cases dilution alone cannot be used to observe the total 73 number of ( ) due to the presence of impurities that act as INPs in the water used for dilution (Polen et al, 2018). 74 Therefore, it is necessary to use different bulk techniques that measure aliquots with volumes that span several orders of 75 magnitude, typically microliter to picoliter volumes (Harrison et 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%