1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02908736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Cleaner” shrimps?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, his observations by SCUBA were undoubtedly of larger adult stages of parasitic crustaceans, as these were visible, and the midgut section of the shrimp may have revealed remnants of ectoparasites (Tziouveli, Bastos Gomes, & Bellwood, ). Although Spotte () considered this evidence enough to suggest that cleaner shrimp as cleaners of fishes be dismissed, Bunkley‐Williams and Williams () and McCammon et al . () provided empirical evidence to the contrary for the same species in a laboratory trial and seminatural exhibit system, respectively.…”
Section: Consider the Grey Literature With Cautionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, his observations by SCUBA were undoubtedly of larger adult stages of parasitic crustaceans, as these were visible, and the midgut section of the shrimp may have revealed remnants of ectoparasites (Tziouveli, Bastos Gomes, & Bellwood, ). Although Spotte () considered this evidence enough to suggest that cleaner shrimp as cleaners of fishes be dismissed, Bunkley‐Williams and Williams () and McCammon et al . () provided empirical evidence to the contrary for the same species in a laboratory trial and seminatural exhibit system, respectively.…”
Section: Consider the Grey Literature With Cautionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we were to consider the view of Spotte () to the exclusion of all observations of cleaning interactions in the literature, there would only be six shrimp considered as cleaners, notably Ancylomenes holthuisi (Palaemonidae) and Urocaridella sp. c. (Becker & Grutter, ), A. pedersoni (Bunkley‐Williams & Williams, ; McCammon et al ., ), Lysmata amboinensis (Militz & Hutson, ), and Palaemon adspersus (Palaemonidae) and Palaemon elegans (Palaemonidae) (Östlund‐Nilsson, Becker, & Nilsson, ).…”
Section: Consider the Grey Literature With Cautionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The brightly colored pattern with red stripes and setose antennae typical of most crustacean “cleaners”, tends to support this interpretation. However, as pointed out by Bauer (2004), cleaning symbiosis is a controversial topic, in part because the term “cleaner” has been applied based largely on anecdotal evidence to most of the 43 species of decapods that have been categorized as “cleaners”, all of which are caridean or stenopodidean shrimp except for two species of brachyurans (Spotte 1998, Côté 2000, Becker and Grutter 2004, Wicksten 2009). The term “cleaner” in the literature has been used for a wide range of presumed symbiotic associations that are not always clear, although studies have focused much more on “cleaner” fishes (e.g., Losey 1987 and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some highly priced species present in Portuguese waters are known to play roles in cleaning symbioses (such as the wrasses from the genus Coris, Symphodus, and Thalassoma (Zander et al, 1999) and the shrimp from the genus Lysmata (Wirtz, 1995)). Although the actual significance of these associations is still not totally understood (see Spotte, 1998;Losey et al, 1999;Côté, 2000), the ecological impact of removing cleaners from the wild is unpredictable. In addition, species with very demanding captivity requirements make up 80% of post-harvest mortalities (Bunting et al, 2003), either in the wholesale/retail trade or the hobbyists' aquaria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%