2022
DOI: 10.1137/21m1397325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clean Clutters and Dyadic Fractional Packings

Abstract: A vector is dyadic if each of its entries is a dyadic rational number, i.e., an integer multiple of 1 2 k for some nonnegative integer k. We prove that every clean clutter with a covering number of at least two has a dyadic fractional packing of value two. This result is best possible for there exist clean clutters with a covering number of three and no dyadic fractional packing of value three. Examples of clean clutters include ideal clutters, binary clutters, and clutters without an intersecting minor. Our p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then (D) has a dyadic optimal solution. This theorem confirms a conjecture of Seymour on ideal clutters, called the Dyadic Conjecture, for the clutter of T -joins (see [14], §79.3e, and [1]).…”
Section: (D)supporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then (D) has a dyadic optimal solution. This theorem confirms a conjecture of Seymour on ideal clutters, called the Dyadic Conjecture, for the clutter of T -joins (see [14], §79.3e, and [1]).…”
Section: (D)supporting
confidence: 85%
“…One must then revise the question, and may ask the following: Does (D) always have a quarterintegral optimal solution? This would then become a special case of the 1 4 -MFMC Conjecture for ideal clutters [6], and would follow from the generalized Fulkerson conjecture [16] (see also [5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, when A is the T -cut versus edge incidence matrix of a graft, an optimal dual solution y is 1 2 -integral (Lovász [22]). Seymour's conjecture was proved recently in a couple of other special cases [2], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It can be readily checked that the set of finitely p-adic numbers is the set of finite series of the form M i=N a i p i , where M, N ∈ Z, M ≥ N , and 0 ≤ a i < p, a i ∈ Z for all N ≤ i ≤ M , justifying our terminology. 2 In this paper, we will only deal with finitely p-adic numbers; for simplicity we refer to them as p-adic numbers throughout the paper. Also we refer to "2-adic" as "dyadic".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%